Literature DB >> 19522059

Evaluation of sorafenib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

David Lyrdal1, Marianne Boijsen, Madis Suurküla, Sven Lundstam, Ulrika Stierner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib are the most effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) today. In this study, we used [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) with positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) to evaluate early effects of sorafenib in patients with MRCC.
METHODS: Ten patients, eight males and two females, with a mean age of 61 years (49-72 years), with MRCC were enrolled. A total of 52 lesions, two to nine lesions/patient, out of which 39 were soft lesions, were evaluated. The [18F]FDG-PET/CT was performed before treatment and after 1-2 months. A region of interest (ROI) was identified including the lesions where the glucose uptake was measured, calculating the average value within the ROI and using the cerebellum as the reference. The same ROI was measured in the subsequent FDG-PET. The sum of the diameters was measured in CT according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Sorafenib was given 400 mg twice daily orally.
RESULTS: After 1-2 months, the mean glucose uptake in all lesions decreased to 75% (32-105%) of initial values of ROI as measured by FDG-PET. The mean glucose uptake in soft lesions decreased to 71% (32-108%) and in skeletal lesions to 82% (53-101%). The sum of the diameters measured by CT decreased to 80% (57-94%) of the initial value in soft lesions according to the RECIST.
CONCLUSION: An early decrease in the mean glucose uptake was found in both soft and skeletal lesions after treatment with sorafenib. FDG-PET thus seems to be advantageous, compared with RECIST evaluation, which is limited to soft lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19522059     DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e32832cc220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  24 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Evaluation of treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: role of state-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Venkata S Katabathina; Nathalie Lassau; Ivan Pedrosa; Chaan S Ng; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Metabolically Active Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vidhya Karivedu; Amit L Jain; Thomas J Eluvathingal; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging.

Authors:  Astrid A M van der Veldt; Martijn R Meijerink; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Epie Boven
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  Functional imaging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Ian D Davis; Damien M Bolton; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Recommendations for the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Luís León; Roberto García-Figueiras; Roberto García-Figueras; Cristina Suárez; Antonia Arjonilla; Javier Puente; Blanca Vargas; Maria José Méndez Vidal; Carmen Sebastiá
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  Metabolic features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jehonathan H Pinthus; Kaitlyn F Whelan; Daniel Gallino; Jian-Ping Lu; Nathan Rothschild
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  [Value of positron emission tomography in urological neoplasms: more form than substance?].

Authors:  J Müller; M Schrader; A J Schrader; M Höpfner; F Zengerling
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances.

Authors:  Silanath Peungjesada; Hubert H Chuang; Srinivasa R Prasad; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Yulia Bronstein
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

10.  Sorafenib increases 18-FDG colic uptake: demonstration in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Renaud Ciappuccini; Géraldine Trzepla; Natacha Heutte; Emmanuel Sevin; Marie Pierre Galais; Stéphane Bardet
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.