OBJECTIVE: While multiple lines of evidence suggest the importance of genetic contributors to risk of preterm birth, the nature of the genetic component has not been identified. We perform segregation analyses to identify the best fitting genetic model for gestational age, a quantitative proxy for preterm birth. METHODS: Because either mother or infant can be considered the proband from a preterm delivery and there is evidence to suggest that genetic factors in either one or both may influence the trait, we performed segregation analysis for gestational age either attributed to the infant (infant's gestational age), or the mother (by averaging the gestational ages at which her children were delivered), using 96 multiplex preterm families. RESULTS: These data lend further support to a genetic component contributing to birth timing since sporadic (i.e. no familial resemblance) and nontransmission (i.e. environmental factors alone contribute to gestational age) models are strongly rejected. Analyses of gestational age attributed to the infant support a model in which mother's genome and/or maternally-inherited genes acting in the fetus are largely responsible for birth timing, with a smaller contribution from the paternally-inherited alleles in the fetal genome. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that genetic influences on birth timing are important and likely complex. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVE: While multiple lines of evidence suggest the importance of genetic contributors to risk of preterm birth, the nature of the genetic component has not been identified. We perform segregation analyses to identify the best fitting genetic model for gestational age, a quantitative proxy for preterm birth. METHODS: Because either mother or infant can be considered the proband from a preterm delivery and there is evidence to suggest that genetic factors in either one or both may influence the trait, we performed segregation analysis for gestational age either attributed to the infant (infant's gestational age), or the mother (by averaging the gestational ages at which her children were delivered), using 96 multiplex preterm families. RESULTS: These data lend further support to a genetic component contributing to birth timing since sporadic (i.e. no familial resemblance) and nontransmission (i.e. environmental factors alone contribute to gestational age) models are strongly rejected. Analyses of gestational age attributed to the infant support a model in which mother's genome and/or maternally-inherited genes acting in the fetus are largely responsible for birth timing, with a smaller contribution from the paternally-inherited alleles in the fetal genome. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that genetic influences on birth timing are important and likely complex. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Astrid Lunde; Kari Klungsøyr Melve; Håkon K Gjessing; Rolv Skjaerven; Lorentz M Irgens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lisanne Palomar; Emily A DeFranco; Kirstin A Lee; Jenifer E Allsworth; Louis J Muglia Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Joyce A Martin; Hsiang-Ching Kung; T J Mathews; Donna L Hoyert; Donna M Strobino; Bernard Guyer; Shae R Sutton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: George A Macones; Samuel Parry; Mohammed Elkousy; Bonnie Clothier; Serdar H Ural; Jerome F Strauss Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roberto Romero; Digna R Velez Edwards; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Chong Jai Kim; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Brad D Pearce; Lara A Friel; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Madan Kumar Anant; Benjamin A Salisbury; Gerald F Vovis; Min Seob Lee; Ricardo Gomez; Ernesto Behnke; Enrique Oyarzun; Gerard Tromp; Scott M Williams; Ramkumar Menon Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roberto Romero; Lara A Friel; Digna R Velez Edwards; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Chong Jai Kim; Offer Erez; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Brad D Pearce; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Benjamin A Salisbury; Madan Kumar Anant; Gerald F Vovis; Min Seob Lee; Ricardo Gomez; Ernesto Behnke; Enrique Oyarzun; Gerard Tromp; Scott M Williams; Ramkumar Menon Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Nadia Falah; Jude McElroy; Victoria Snegovskikh; Charles J Lockwood; Errol Norwitz; Jeffey C Murray; Edward Kuczynski; Ramkumar Menon; Kari Teramo; Louis J Muglia; Thomas Morgan Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Douglas Brubaker; Yu Liu; Junye Wang; Huiqing Tan; Ge Zhang; Bo Jacobsson; Louis Muglia; Sam Mesiano; Mark R Chance Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Wilfred Wu; David J Witherspoon; Alison Fraser; Erin A S Clark; Alan Rogers; Gregory J Stoddard; Tracy A Manuck; Karin Chen; M Sean Esplin; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner; Lynn B Jorde Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Jude J McElroy; Courtney E Gutman; Christian M Shaffer; Tamara D Busch; Hilkka Puttonen; Kari Teramo; Jeffrey C Murray; Mikko Hallman; Louis J Muglia Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 4.132