Literature DB >> 19520744

Impaired DNA replication prompts deletions within palindromic sequences, but does not induce translocations in human cells.

Hiroki Kurahashi1, Hidehito Inagaki, Takema Kato, Eriko Hosoba, Hiroshi Kogo, Tamae Ohye, Makiko Tsutsumi, Hasbaira Bolor, Maoqing Tong, Beverly S Emanuel.   

Abstract

Palindromic regions are unstable and susceptible to deletion in prokaryotes and eukaryotes possibly due to stalled or slow replication. In the human genome, they also appear to become partially or completely deleted, while two palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRR) contribute to known recurrent constitutional translocations. To explore the mechanism that causes the development of palindrome instabilities in humans, we compared the incidence of de novo translocations and deletions at PATRRs in human cells. Using a highly sensitive PCR assay that can detect single molecules, de novo deletions were detected neither in human somatic cells nor in sperm. However, deletions were detected at low frequency in cultured cell lines. Inhibition of DNA replication by administration of siRNA against the DNA polymerase alpha 1 (POLA1) gene or introduction of POLA inhibitors increased the frequency. This is in contrast to PATRR-mediated translocations that were never detected in similar conditions but were observed frequently in human sperm samples. Further deletions were found to take place during both leading- and lagging-strand synthesis. Our data suggest that stalled or slow replication induces deletions within PATRRs, but that other mechanisms might contribute to PATRR-mediated recurrent translocations in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520744      PMCID: PMC2729664          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  45 in total

1.  Biased distribution of inverted and direct Alus in the human genome: implications for insertion, exclusion, and genome stability.

Authors:  J E Stenger; K S Lobachev; D Gordenin; T A Darden; J Jurka; M A Resnick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Regions of genomic instability on 22q11 and 11q23 as the etiology for the recurrent constitutional t(11;22).

Authors:  H Kurahashi; T H Shaikh; P Hu; B A Roe; B S Emanuel; M L Budarf
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Tightly clustered 11q23 and 22q11 breakpoints permit PCR-based detection of the recurrent constitutional t(11;22).

Authors:  H Kurahashi; T H Shaikh; E H Zackai; L Celle; D A Driscoll; M L Budarf; B S Emanuel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Long AT-rich palindromes and the constitutional t(11;22) breakpoint.

Authors:  H Kurahashi; B S Emanuel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Unexpectedly high rate of de novo constitutional t(11;22) translocations in sperm from normal males.

Authors:  H Kurahashi; B S Emanuel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Evidence for two mechanisms of palindrome-stimulated deletion in Escherichia coli: single-strand annealing and replication slipped mispairing.

Authors:  M Bzymek; S T Lovett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Frequent translocations occur between low copy repeats on chromosome 22q11.2 (LCR22s) and telomeric bands of partner chromosomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spiteri; Melanie Babcock; Catherine D Kashork; Keiko Wakui; Swarna Gogineni; Debbie A Lewis; Kisa M Williams; Shinsei Minoshima; Takashi Sasaki; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Lorraine Potocki; Venkat Pulijaal; Alan Shanske; Lisa G Shaffer; Bernice E Morrow
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  The position of t(11;22)(q23;q11) constitutional translocation breakpoint is conserved among its carriers.

Authors:  I Tapia-Páez; M Kost-Alimova; P Hu; B A Roe; E Blennow; L Fedorova; S Imreh; J P Dumanski
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  Kirill S Lobachev; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The constitutional t(17;22): another translocation mediated by palindromic AT-rich repeats.

Authors:  Hiroki Kurahashi; Tamim Shaikh; Masayuki Takata; Tatsushi Toda; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal translocations and palindromic AT-rich repeats.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Hiroki Kurahashi; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  The constitutional t(11;22): implications for a novel mechanism responsible for gross chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  H Kurahashi; H Inagaki; T Ohye; H Kogo; M Tsutsumi; T Kato; M Tong; B S Emanuel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution.

Authors:  Junhua Zhao; Albino Bacolla; Guliang Wang; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  CNV instability associated with DNA replication dynamics: evidence for replicative mechanisms in CNV mutagenesis.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Weichen Zhou; Cheng Zhang; James R Lupski; Li Jin; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Multiple cellular mechanisms prevent chromosomal rearrangements involving repetitive DNA.

Authors:  Carolyn M George; Eric Alani
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 8.250

7.  Analysis of the t(3;8) of hereditary renal cell carcinoma: a palindrome-mediated translocation.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Colleen P Franconi; Molly B Sheridan; April M Hacker; Hidehito Inagakai; Thomas W Glover; Martin F Arlt; Harry A Drabkin; Robert M Gemmill; Hiroki Kurahashi; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2014-03-18

8.  Two sequential cleavage reactions on cruciform DNA structures cause palindrome-mediated chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  Hidehito Inagaki; Tamae Ohye; Hiroshi Kogo; Makiko Tsutsumi; Takema Kato; Maoqing Tong; Beverly S Emanuel; Hiroki Kurahashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Hidehito Inagaki; Maoqing Tong; Hiroshi Kogo; Tamae Ohye; Kouji Yamada; Makiko Tsutsumi; Beverly S Emanuel; Hiroki Kurahashi
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Breakpoint analysis of the recurrent constitutional t(8;22)(q24.13;q11.21) translocation.

Authors:  Divya Mishra; Takema Kato; Hidehito Inagaki; Tomoki Kosho; Keiko Wakui; Yasuhiro Kido; Satoru Sakazume; Mariko Taniguchi-Ikeda; Naoya Morisada; Kazumoto Iijima; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Beverly S Emanuel; Hiroki Kurahashi
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.