Literature DB >> 19519452

Quality assessment of protein structure models.

Daisuke Kihara1, Hao Chen, Yifeng David Yang.   

Abstract

Computational protein tertiary structure prediction has made significant progress over the last decade due to the advancement of techniques and the growth of sequence and structure databases. However, it is still not very easy to predict the accuracy of a given predicted structure. Predicting the accuracy, or quality assessment of a prediction model, is crucial for a practical use of the model such as biochemical experimental design and drug design. Recently several model quality assessment programs (MQAPs) have been proposed for assessing global and local accuracy of predicted structures. We will start with reviewing the current status of protein structure prediction methods with an emphasis on the source of errors. Then existing MQAPs are classified into several categories and each is discussed. The categories include methods which evaluate the quality of template-target alignments, those which evaluate stereochemical irregularities of prediction models, and methods which integrate several features into a composite quality assessment score.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19519452     DOI: 10.2174/138920309788452173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci        ISSN: 1389-2037            Impact factor:   3.272


  23 in total

1.  Structure prediction and binding sites analysis of curcin protein of Jatropha curcas using computational approaches.

Authors:  Mugdha Srivastava; Shishir K Gupta; P C Abhilash; Nandita Singh
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction.

Authors:  Anurag Bagaria; Victor Jaravine; Yuanpeng J Huang; Gaetano T Montelione; Peter Güntert
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Sub-AQUA: real-value quality assessment of protein structure models.

Authors:  Yifeng David Yang; Preston Spratt; Hao Chen; Changsoon Park; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.650

4.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Computational tools for epitope vaccine design and evaluation.

Authors:  Linling He; Jiang Zhu
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Free energies for coarse-grained proteins by integrating multibody statistical contact potentials with entropies from elastic network models.

Authors:  Michael T Zimmermann; Sumudu P Leelananda; Pawel Gniewek; Yaping Feng; Robert L Jernigan; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  Multibody coarse-grained potentials for native structure recognition and quality assessment of protein models.

Authors:  Pawel Gniewek; Sumudu P Leelananda; Andrzej Kolinski; Robert L Jernigan; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-04-19

8.  Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-01

9.  Computational methods for constructing protein structure models from 3D electron microscopy maps.

Authors:  Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 10.  Bioinformatics and variability in drug response: a protein structural perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lahti; Grace W Tang; Emidio Capriotti; Tianyun Liu; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.