Literature DB >> 1951893

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck malignancies.

J R Saunders1, M S Brown, R M Hirata, D A Jaques.   

Abstract

One hundred thirty-six percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs) were placed in 126 patients with head and neck malignancies. PEG was performed by the "push" technique described by Russell. There were 140 PEG attempts, with 136 successful placements (97%). Seven complications occurred related to tube placement (5% of placements). Complications encountered were prolonged ileus in one patient (1%), local skin wound infection in one patient (1%), and early tube dislodgment in five patients (4%). Three patients required laparotomy (2%). There were no episodes of aspiration and no deaths. Patients were followed up for an average of 11 months, with a mean duration of PEG tube placement of 6 1/2 months. Patients continued PEG feedings throughout the postoperative radiotherapy period and until oral intake was satisfactory. Acceptance of PEG feedings has been high. No patient required rehospitalization for nutritional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1951893     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90153-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Complications of percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer--an analysis of 42 consecutive patients.

Authors:  G M Walton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Jason M Foster; Peter Filocamo; Hector Nava; Michael Schiff; Wesley Hicks; Nestor Rigual; Judy Smith; Thom Loree; John F Gibbs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prophylactic feeding tubes for patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy-systematic review and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  C Orphanidou; K Biggs; M E Johnston; J R Wright; A Bowman; S J Hotte; A Esau; C Myers; V Blunt; M Lafleur; B Sheehan; M A Griffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  A descriptive review of the factors contributing to nutritional compromise in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Martin R Chasen; Ravi Bhargava
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J P Grant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Stomal seeding of head and neck cancer by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  D S Lee; M A Mohit-Tabatabai; B F Rush; C Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for supportive therapy of advanced aerodigestive cancer.

Authors:  Haruei Ogino; Hirotada Akiho
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2013-11-15

9.  Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area.

Authors:  E A Isenring; S Capra; J D Bauer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.