Literature DB >> 19516995

Aphid acceptance of barley exposed to volatile phytochemicals differs between plants exposed in daylight and darkness.

Robert Glinwood1, Therese Gradin, Barbara Karpinska, Elham Ahmed, Llisbeth Jonsson, Velemir Ninkovic.   

Abstract

It is well known that volatile cues from damaged plants may induce resistance in neighboring plants. Much less is known about the effects of volatile interaction between undamaged plants. In this study, barley plants, Hordeum vulgare cv. Kara, were exposed to volatiles from undamaged plants of barley cv. Alva or thistle Cirsium vulgare, and to the volatile phytochemicals, methyl salicylate or methyl jasmonate. Exposures were made either during natural daylight or darkness. Acceptance of exposed plants by the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi was assessed, as well as the expression of putative marker genes for the different treatments. Aphid acceptance of plants exposed to either barley or C. vulgare was significantly reduced, and an effect of the volatiles from undamaged plants was confirmed by the induction of pathogenesis-related protein, PR1a in exposed plants. However the effect on aphid acceptance was seen only when plants were exposed during darkness, whereas PR1a was induced only after treatment during daylight. Aphid acceptance of plants exposed to either methyl salicylate or methyl jasmonate was significantly reduced, but only when plants were exposed to the chemicals during daylight. AOS2 (allene oxide synthase) was induced by methyl jasmonate and BCI-4 (barley chemical inducible gene-4) by methyl salicylate in both daylight and darkness. It is concluded that (a) the effects on aphids of exposing barley to volatile phytochemicals was influenced by the presence or absence of light and (b) the response of barley to methyl salicylate/methyl jasmonate and to volatiles from undamaged plants differed at the gene and herbivore level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PR1; Rhopalosiphum padi; allelobiosis; allene oxide synthase; barley; light; methyl jasmonate; methyl salicylate

Year:  2007        PMID: 19516995      PMCID: PMC2634203          DOI: 10.4161/psb.2.5.4494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  22 in total

1.  Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data.

Authors:  Christian Ramakers; Jan M Ruijter; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; Antoon F M Moorman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females.

Authors:  C M De Moraes; M C Mescher; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions.

Authors:  Ulo Niinemets; Francesco Loreto; Markus Reichstein
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 5.  Herbivore-induced, indirect plant defences.

Authors:  Gen-ichiro Arimura; Christian Kost; Wilhelm Boland
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2005-03-17

6.  Allene oxide synthases of barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Salome): tissue specific regulation in seedling development.

Authors:  H Maucher; B Hause; I Feussner; J Ziegler; C Wasternack
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Diel periodicity in the production of green leaf volatiles by wild and cultivated host plants of stemborer moths, Chilo partellus and Busseola fusca.

Authors:  K Chamberlain; Z R Khan; J A Pickett; T Toshova; L J Wadhams
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Differential volatile emissions and salicylic acid levels from tobacco plants in response to different strains of Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Yasmin J Cardoza; Eric A Schmelz; Ramesh Raina; Jürgen Engelberth; James H Tumlinson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Light conditions influence specific defence responses in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions: uncoupling systemic resistance from salicylic acid and PR-1 accumulation.

Authors:  Jürgen Zeier; Bianka Pink; Martin J Mueller; Susanne Berger
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Transcriptional regulation of sorghum defense determinants against a phloem-feeding aphid.

Authors:  Keyan Zhu-Salzman; Ron A Salzman; Ji-Eun Ahn; Hisashi Koiwa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of within-species plant genotype mixing on habitat preference of a polyphagous insect predator.

Authors:  Velemir Ninkovic; Sate Al Abassi; Elham Ahmed; Robert Glinwood; Jan Pettersson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Behavioural responses of Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande larvae to methyl jasmonate and cis-jasmone.

Authors:  Barbara Egger; Elisabeth H Koschier
Journal:  J Pest Sci (2004)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.918

3.  Microarray analysis of the interaction between the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and host plants reveals both differences and similarities between susceptible and partially resistant barley lines.

Authors:  Gabriele Delp; Therese Gradin; Inger Ahman; Lisbeth M V Jonsson
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Continuous exposure to the deterrents cis-jasmone and methyl jasmonate does not alter the behavioural responses of Frankliniella occidentalis.

Authors:  Barbara Egger; Bernhard Spangl; Elisabeth Helene Koschier
Journal:  Entomol Exp Appl       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Functional analysis and expressional characterization of rice ankyrin repeat-containing protein, OsPIANK1, in basal defense against Magnaporthe oryzae attack.

Authors:  Shaoliang Mou; Zhiqin Liu; Deyi Guan; Ailian Qiu; Yan Lai; Shuilin He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.