Literature DB >> 19085010

Microarray analysis of the interaction between the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi and host plants reveals both differences and similarities between susceptible and partially resistant barley lines.

Gabriele Delp1, Therese Gradin, Inger Ahman, Lisbeth M V Jonsson.   

Abstract

The bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L.) is an important pest on cereals causing plant growth reduction without specific leaf symptoms. Breeding of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) for R. padi resistance shows that there are several resistance genes, reducing aphid growth. To identify candidate sequences for resistance-related genes, we performed microarray analysis of gene expression after aphid infestation in two susceptible and two partially resistant barley genotypes. One of the four lines is a descendant of two of the other genotypes. There were large differences in gene induction between the four lines, indicating substantial variation in response even between closely related genotypes. Genes induced in aphid-infested tissue were mainly related to defence, primary metabolism and signalling. Only 24 genes were induced in all lines, none of them related to oxidative stress or secondary metabolism. Few genes were down-regulated, with none being common to all four lines. There were differences in aphid-induced gene regulation between resistant and susceptible lines. Results from control plants without aphids also revealed differences in constitutive gene expression between the two types of lines. Candidate sequences for induced and constitutive resistance factors have been identified, among them a proteinase inhibitor, a serine/threonine kinase and several thionins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19085010     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-008-0409-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  41 in total

1.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data.

Authors:  Christian Ramakers; Jan M Ruijter; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; Antoon F M Moorman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Structural analysis of the unique insecticidal activity of novel mungbean defensin VrD1 reveals possibility of homoplasy evolution between plant defensins and scorpion neurotoxins.

Authors:  Yu-Shuan Shiau; Shu-Bin Horng; Ching-San Chen; Po-Tsang Huang; Chan Lin; Yi-Ching Hsueh; Kuo-Long Lou
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.137

3.  Is photosynthetic transcriptional regulation in Triticum aestivum L. cv. 'TugelaDN' a contributing factor for tolerance to Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae)?

Authors:  Anna-Maria Botha; Lynelle Lacock; Chantal van Niekerk; M Thuto Matsioloko; Franco B du Preez; Shilo Loots; Eduard Venter; Karl J Kunert; Christopher A Cullis
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Identification of expression profiles of sorghum genes in response to greenbug phloem-feeding using cDNA subtraction and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Park; Yinghua Huang; Patricia Ayoubi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Gene expression and glucosinolate accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to generalist and specialist herbivores of different feeding guilds and the role of defense signaling pathways.

Authors:  Inga Mewis; James G Tokuhisa; Jack C Schultz; Heidi M Appel; Christian Ulrichs; Jonathan Gershenzon
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  Activation of the gene promoter of barley beta-1,3-glucanase isoenzyme GIII is salicylic acid (SA)-dependent in transgenic rice plants.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Li; Rui Zhu; Peilin Xu
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack.

Authors:  Martin De Vos; Vivian R Van Oosten; Remco M P Van Poecke; Johan A Van Pelt; Maria J Pozo; Martin J Mueller; Antony J Buchala; Jean-Pierre Métraux; L C Van Loon; Marcel Dicke; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  An improved detection method for the Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV) allows monitoring of its presence in aphids and movement within plants.

Authors:  L Ban; A Didon; L M V Jonsson; R Glinwood; G Delp
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.014

9.  Transcriptional regulation of sorghum defense determinants against a phloem-feeding aphid.

Authors:  Keyan Zhu-Salzman; Ron A Salzman; Ji-Eun Ahn; Hisashi Koiwa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  A chalcone synthase with an unusual substrate preference is expressed in barley leaves in response to UV light and pathogen attack.

Authors:  A B Christensen; P L Gregersen; J Schröder; D B Collinge
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.076

View more
  21 in total

1.  Benzoxazinoid metabolites regulate innate immunity against aphids and fungi in maize.

Authors:  Shakoor Ahmad; Nathalie Veyrat; Ruth Gordon-Weeks; Yuhua Zhang; Janet Martin; Lesley Smart; Gaétan Glauser; Matthias Erb; Victor Flors; Monika Frey; Jurriaan Ton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Engineering plants for aphid resistance: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Xiudao Yu; Genping Wang; Siliang Huang; Youzhi Ma; Lanqin Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Plant systems biology: insights, advances and challenges.

Authors:  Bhavisha P Sheth; Vrinda S Thaker
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Foliar aphid feeding recruits rhizosphere bacteria and primes plant immunity against pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in pepper.

Authors:  Boyoung Lee; Soohyun Lee; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Plant-pathogen interactions: what microarray tells about it?

Authors:  T D Lodha; J Basak
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Microbial symbionts in insects influence down-regulation of defense genes in maize.

Authors:  Kelli L Barr; Leonard B Hearne; Sandra Briesacher; Thomas L Clark; Georgia E Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Manipulation of plant defense responses by the tomato psyllid (Bactericerca cockerelli) and its associated endosymbiont Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous.

Authors:  Clare L Casteel; Allison K Hansen; Linda L Walling; Timothy D Paine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mobilization of lipids and fortification of cell wall and cuticle are important in host defense against Hessian fly.

Authors:  Chitvan Khajuria; Haiyan Wang; Xuming Liu; Shanda Wheeler; John C Reese; Mustapha El Bouhssini; R Jeff Whitworth; Ming-Shun Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Expression of potential resistance genes to the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae, in wheat, Triticum aestivum.

Authors:  Chun-Ping Wang; Zheng-Hong Wang; Hui-Yan Zhao; Qi-Di Zhu; Kun Luo; Li-Ming Wang; Pu-Hui Dong
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of a compatible tomato-aphid interaction reveals a predominant salicylic acid-dependent plant response.

Authors:  Valentina Coppola; Mariangela Coppola; Mariapina Rocco; Maria Cristina Digilio; Chiara D'Ambrosio; Giovanni Renzone; Rosanna Martinelli; Andrea Scaloni; Francesco Pennacchio; Rosa Rao; Giandomenico Corrado
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.