Literature DB >> 19515662

Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores?

Colin Fontaine1, Elisa Thébault, Isabelle Dajoz.   

Abstract

Recent community-level studies have acknowledged that generalist species are more widespread than previously thought and highlighted their preponderant impact on community functioning and evolution. It is suggested that the type of interaction, trophic versus mutualistic, should affect species generalization level; however, no direct comparison has been made yet. Here, we performed such a comparison using 44 plant-insect networks describing either pollination or herbivory communities. Our analysis shows that the type of interaction does indeed have an impact on various aspects of species generalism, from the distribution of generalism in the community to the phylogenetic diversity of the plants with which a given insect species interacts. However, the amplitude of the observed differences depends on the aspect of species generalism studied. While the non-quantitative and quantitative measures of generalism suggest that pollinators interact with more plant species and more evenly than herbivores, phylogenetic measures clearly show that herbivores interact with plant species far more closely related to each other than pollinators. This comparative approach offers a promising perspective to better understand the functioning and evolution of multispecies assemblages by pointing out some fundamental singularities of communities depending on the type of interaction considered.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515662      PMCID: PMC2817221          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D I Bolnick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest.

Authors:  Vojtech Novotny; Yves Basset; Scott E Miller; George D Weiblen; Birgitta Bremer; Lukas Cizek; Pavel Drozd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Food web structure of three guilds of natural enemies: predators, parasitoids and pathogens of aphids.

Authors:  F J F Van Veen; C B Müller; J K Pell; H C J Godfray
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees?

Authors:  Paulo R Guimarães; Cristina Sazima; Sérgio Furtado dos Reis; Ivan Sazima
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Paulo R Guimarães; Victor Rico-Gray; Paulo S Oliveira; Thiago J Izzo; Sérgio F dos Reis; John N Thompson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Finding NEMO: nestedness engendered by mutualistic organization in anemonefish and their hosts.

Authors:  Jeff Ollerton; Duncan McCollin; Daphne G Fautin; Gerald R Allen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Enrico L Rezende; Jessica E Lavabre; Paulo R Guimarães; Pedro Jordano; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution.

Authors:  Campbell O Webb; David D Ackerly; Steven W Kembel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Apparent competition, quantitative food webs, and the structure of phytophagous insect communities.

Authors:  F J Frank van Veen; Rebecca J Morris; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities.

Authors:  Colin Fontaine; Isabelle Dajoz; Jacques Meriguet; Michel Loreau
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluating factors that predict the structure of a commensalistic epiphyte-phorophyte network.

Authors:  Roberto Sáyago; Martha Lopezaraiza-Mikel; Mauricio Quesada; Mariana Yolotl Álvarez-Añorve; Alfredo Cascante-Marín; Jesus Ma Bastida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fitness effects of plasmids shape the structure of bacteria-plasmid interaction networks.

Authors:  Arthur Newbury; Beth Dawson; Uli Klümper; Elze Hesse; Meaghan Castledine; Colin Fontaine; Angus Buckling; Dirk Sanders
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  What Can Interaction Webs Tell Us About Species Roles?

Authors:  Elizabeth L Sander; J Timothy Wootton; Stefano Allesina
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Evaluating the spatio-temporal factors that structure network parameters of plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Antonio López-Carretero; Cecilia Díaz-Castelazo; Karina Boege; Víctor Rico-Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Disentangling the co-structure of multilayer interaction networks: degree distribution and module composition in two-layer bipartite networks.

Authors:  Julia Astegiano; Florian Altermatt; François Massol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identifying species at coextinction risk when detection is imperfect: Model evaluation and case study.

Authors:  Michaela Plein; William K Morris; Melinda L Moir; Peter A Vesk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spatial variability of hosts, parasitoids and their interactions across a homogeneous landscape.

Authors:  Anna Torné-Noguera; Xavier Arnan; Anselm Rodrigo; Jordi Bosch
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Introduced plants as novel Anthropocene habitats for insects.

Authors:  Roberto J Padovani; Andrew Salisbury; Helen Bostock; David B Roy; Chris D Thomas
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Exposing the structure of an Arctic food web.

Authors:  Helena K Wirta; Eero J Vesterinen; Peter A Hambäck; Elisabeth Weingartner; Claus Rasmussen; Jeroen Reneerkens; Niels M Schmidt; Olivier Gilg; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Food-web structure in relation to environmental gradients and predator-prey ratios in tank-bromeliad ecosystems.

Authors:  Olivier Dézerald; Céline Leroy; Bruno Corbara; Jean-François Carrias; Laurent Pélozuelo; Alain Dejean; Régis Céréghino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.