Literature DB >> 19513546

Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours.

Lennart Hardell1, Michael Carlberg.   

Abstract

The Hardell-group conducted during 1997-2003 two case control studies on brain tumours including assessment of use of mobile phones and cordless phones. The questionnaire was answered by 905 (90%) cases with malignant brain tumours, 1,254 (88%) cases with benign tumours and 2,162 (89%) population-based controls. Cases were reported from the Swedish Cancer Registries. Anatomical area in the brain for the tumour was assessed and related to side of the head used for both types of wireless phones. In the current analysis we defined ipsilateral use (same side as the tumour) as >or=50% of the use and contralateral use (opposite side) as <50% of the calling time. We report now further results for use of mobile and cordless phones. Regarding astrocytoma we found highest risk for ipsilateral mobile phone use in the >10 year latency group, OR=3.3, 95% CI=2.0-5.4 and for cordless phone use OR=5.0, 95% CI=2.3-11. In total, the risk was highest for cases with first use <20 years age, for mobile phone OR=5.2, 95% CI=2.2-12 and for cordless phone OR=4.4, 95% CI=1.9-10. For acoustic neuroma, the highest OR was found for ipsilateral use and >10 year latency, for mobile phone OR=3.0, 95% CI=1.4-6.2 and cordless phone OR=2.3, 95% CI=0.6-8.8. Overall highest OR for mobile phone use was found in subjects with first use at age <20 years, OR=5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16 whereas no association was found for cordless phone in that group, but based on only one exposed case. The annual age-adjusted incidence of astrocytoma for the age group >19 years increased significantly by +2.16%, 95% CI +0.25 to +4.10 during 2000-2007 in Sweden in spite of seemingly underreporting of cases to the Swedish Cancer Registry. A decreasing incidence was found for acoustic neuroma during the same period. However, the medical diagnosis and treatment of this tumour type has changed during recent years and underreporting from a single center would have a large impact for such a rare tumour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513546     DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  26 in total

Review 1.  Cell phones and glioma risk: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Courtney Corle; Milan Makale; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The genotoxic effect of radiofrequency waves on mouse brain.

Authors:  Emin Karaca; Burak Durmaz; Huseyin Aktug; Huseyin Altug; Teoman Yildiz; Candan Guducu; Melis Irgi; Mehtap Gulcihan Cinar Koksal; Ferda Ozkinay; Cumhur Gunduz; Ozgur Cogulu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Analysis of the Genotoxic Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation using Buccal Micronucleus Assay: A Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Sumita Banerjee; Narendra Nath Singh; Gadiputi Sreedhar; Saikat Mukherjee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Dardo Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Paul Vaska; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang; Dave Alexoff; Jean Logan; Christopher Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The Intracranial Distribution of Gliomas in Relation to Exposure From Mobile Phones: Analyses From the INTERPHONE Study.

Authors:  Kathrine Grell; Kirsten Frederiksen; Joachim Schüz; Elisabeth Cardis; Bruce Armstrong; Jack Siemiatycki; Daniel R Krewski; Mary L McBride; Christoffer Johansen; Anssi Auvinen; Martine Hours; Maria Blettner; Siegal Sadetzki; Susanna Lagorio; Naohito Yamaguchi; Alistair Woodward; Tore Tynes; Maria Feychting; Sarah J Fleming; Anthony J Swerdlow; Per K Andersen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Association between number of cell phone contracts and brain tumor incidence in nineteen U.S. States.

Authors:  Steven Lehrer; Sheryl Green; Richard G Stock
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Study of electromagnetic radiation pollution in an Indian city.

Authors:  A K Dhami
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States.

Authors:  Peter D Inskip; Robert N Hoover; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards.

Authors:  Dariusz Leszczynski; Zhengping Xu
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-01-27

10.  Exposure to mobile phone radiations at 2350 MHz incites cyto- and genotoxic effects in root meristems of Allium cepa.

Authors:  Shikha Chandel; Shalinder Kaur; Mohd Issa; Harminder Pal Singh; Daizy Rani Batish; Ravinder Kumar Kohli
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2019-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.