Literature DB >> 19512860

Noninvasive temperature monitoring in postanesthesia care units.

Geoffrey E Langham1, Ankit Maheshwari, Kevin Contrera, Jing You, Edward Mascha, Daniel I Sessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial postoperative core temperature is a physician and hospital performance measure. However, the extent to which core temperature changes during emergence from anesthesia and transport from the operating room to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) remains unknown. Similarly, the accuracy of many noninvasive temperature-monitoring methods used in the PACU has yet to be quantified. This study, therefore, quantified the change in core temperature occurring during emergence and transport and evaluated the accuracy and precision of eight noninvasive thermometers in the PACU.
METHODS: In 50 patients having laparoscopic surgery, the authors measured temperatures upon PACU arrival and 30 and 60 min thereafter. Monitoring methods included oral, axillary, temporal artery, forehead skin-surface, forehead liquid-crystal display, infrared aural canal, deep forehead, and deep chest. Bladder temperature was used as the reference and was also measured at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was agreement between individual temperatures from each method and bladder temperature in the PACU. A priori, the authors chose 0.5 degrees C as a clinically important temperature deviation.
RESULTS: Bladder temperature increased 0.2 +/- 0.3 degrees C (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.3 degrees C), P < 0.001, during transport. None of the tested noninvasive thermometers was consistently within 0.5 degrees C of bladder temperature. However, oral, deep forehead, and temporal artery temperatures were significantly better than other methods and agreed reasonably well with bladder temperature.
CONCLUSIONS: Invasive temperature monitoring available intraoperatively is more accurate than any generally available postoperative methods. Physician performance measures should therefore not be based exclusively on postoperative temperatures. Among the generally available postoperative monitoring methods, electronic oral thermometry appears to be the best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19512860     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a864ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  [Preoperative prewarming as a routine measure. First experiences].

Authors:  A Bräuer; R M Waeschle; D Heise; T Perl; J Hinz; M Quintel; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Are all thermometers equal? A study of three infrared thermometers to detect fever in an African outpatient clinic.

Authors:  Nirmal Ravi; Mathura Vithyananthan; Aisha Saidu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Comparison of temporal artery temperature and bladder temperature in the postanesthesia care unit.

Authors:  Stephanie L Bradley; Andrzej P Kwater; Jessica M Cooke; Catherine M Pivalizza; Xu Zhang; Srikanth Sridhar; Sam D Gumbert; Evan G Pivalizza
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-07-15

4.  Comparison of a Continuous Noninvasive Temperature to Monitor Core Temperature Measures During Targeted Temperature Management.

Authors:  Melissa Wagner; Krista Lim-Hing; Mary Ann Bautista; Brigid Blaber; Taghi Ryder; Joseph Haymore; Neeraj Badjatia
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Investigation of the Impact of Infrared Sensors on Core Body Temperature Monitoring by Comparing Measurement Sites.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Chen; Andrew Chen; Chiachung Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  The focus of temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technology (3M Bair-Hugger): a clinical study with patients undergoing craniotomy.

Authors:  Eero Pesonen; Marja Silvasti-Lundell; Tomi T Niemi; Riku Kivisaari; Juha Hernesniemi; Marja-Tellervo Mäkinen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Temperature measurements with a temporal scanner: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Ruzan Udumyan; Georg Lohse; Ylva Nilsagård
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Forced air warming during sedation in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Suzanna Ersotelos; Joanna Sutherland; Jed Duff
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Monocyte Function and Clinical Outcomes in Febrile and Afebrile Patients With Severe Sepsis.

Authors:  Anne M Drewry; Enyo A Ablordeppey; Ellen T Murray; Catherine M Dalton; Brian M Fuller; Marin H Kollef; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.454

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.