Donna K Arnett1, Steven A Claas, Amy I Lynch. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0022, USA. arnett@ms.soph.uab.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent advances in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics and discuss challenges related to translating this knowledge into 'personalized medicine' for the initial drug treatment of hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies included both prospective and retrospective analyses ranging from small clinical investigations of 42 participants to large, multicenter, randomized, outcome-based clinical trials of nearly 40 000 individuals. Treatment with drugs from five classes of antihypertensives was evaluated in these studies. The duration of treatment ranged from week-long follow up for blood pressure response to a decade-long follow up for clinical outcomes. In total, associations with 12 different candidate genes were assessed. These studies present the now familiar mixture of significant and nonsignificant pharmacogenetic findings that are sometimes consistent with, sometimes inconsistent with, previous findings in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics. SUMMARY: Recent research in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics has added to the existing evidence base, and novel genes and variants as well as new methodologies are cause for continued optimism. However, translation of genomic science to clinical settings has not kept pace with growing interest in personalized medicine for hypertension. New research paradigms may be needed to translate pharmacogenetics into clinical tools. Clinical application will also require a trained clinical workforce, validated genetic tests, and payers willing to fund pretreatment testing.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent advances in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics and discuss challenges related to translating this knowledge into 'personalized medicine' for the initial drug treatment of hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies included both prospective and retrospective analyses ranging from small clinical investigations of 42 participants to large, multicenter, randomized, outcome-based clinical trials of nearly 40 000 individuals. Treatment with drugs from five classes of antihypertensives was evaluated in these studies. The duration of treatment ranged from week-long follow up for blood pressure response to a decade-long follow up for clinical outcomes. In total, associations with 12 different candidate genes were assessed. These studies present the now familiar mixture of significant and nonsignificant pharmacogenetic findings that are sometimes consistent with, sometimes inconsistent with, previous findings in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics. SUMMARY: Recent research in antihypertensive pharmacogenetics has added to the existing evidence base, and novel genes and variants as well as new methodologies are cause for continued optimism. However, translation of genomic science to clinical settings has not kept pace with growing interest in personalized medicine for hypertension. New research paradigms may be needed to translate pharmacogenetics into clinical tools. Clinical application will also require a trained clinical workforce, validated genetic tests, and payers willing to fund pretreatment testing.
Authors: N Glorioso; P Manunta; F Filigheddu; C Troffa; P Stella; C Barlassina; C Lombardi; A Soro; F Dettori; P P Parpaglia; M T Alibrandi; D Cusi; G Bianchi Journal: Hypertension Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Julie A Johnson; Issam Zineh; Brian J Puckett; Susan P McGorray; Hossein N Yarandi; Daniel F Pauly Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: J Karlsson; L Lind; P Hallberg; K Michaëlsson; L Kurland; T Kahan; K Malmqvist; K P Ohman; F Nyström; H Melhus Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Graham E J Rodwell; Rebecca Sonu; Jacob M Zahn; James Lund; Julie Wilhelmy; Lingli Wang; Wenzhong Xiao; Michael Mindrinos; Emily Crane; Eran Segal; Bryan D Myers; James D Brooks; Ronald W Davis; John Higgins; Art B Owen; Stuart K Kim Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2004-11-30 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Amy I Lynch; John H Eckfeldt; Barry R Davis; Charles E Ford; Eric Boerwinkle; Catherine Leiendecker-Foster; Donna K Arnett Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.089