J A Miller1, K Thai, J W Scholey. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada. judith.miller@utoronto.ca
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism predicts response to losartan and angiotensin II. BACKGROUND: Most of the known actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) are mediated by the Ang II type 1 receptor (AGT1R). A noncoding polymorphism of the AGT1R gene has been described in which there is either an adenine (A) or cytosine (C) base at position 1166. The functional significance of this polymorphism is unknown, prompting us to examine the relationship between this polymorphism and the systemic and renal responses to AGT1R blockade and subpressor Ang II infusion. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy Caucasian men and women, genotyped for the AGT1R polymorphism by polymerase chain reaction, were chosen to form two homogeneous groups: AA and AC/CC. Renal hemodynamic function was assessed with inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance before and after AGT1R receptor blockade with losartan and Ang II infusion. RESULTS: The mean values at baseline for glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (ERPF), and renal blood flow (RBF) were significantly lower in the AC/CC group compared with the AA group. Losartan increased the GFR and decreased the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the AC/CC group, but did not influence these parameters in the AA group. The aldosterone responses to losartan were blunted in the AA subgroup. During Ang II infusion, AC/CC subjects maintained GFR despite equivalent declines in RBF, suggesting an enhanced efferent arteriolar constrictive response. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that there is a relationship between the AGT1R A1166-->C polymorphism and the humoral and renal hemodynamic responses to AGT1R blockade and to Ang II infusion in the sodium-replete state, and that the C allele is associated with enhanced intrarenal and peripheral Ang II activity. Further studies are required to determine the genetic locus for this effect.
UNLABELLED: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphism predicts response to losartan and angiotensin II. BACKGROUND: Most of the known actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) are mediated by the Ang II type 1 receptor (AGT1R). A noncoding polymorphism of the AGT1R gene has been described in which there is either an adenine (A) or cytosine (C) base at position 1166. The functional significance of this polymorphism is unknown, prompting us to examine the relationship between this polymorphism and the systemic and renal responses to AGT1R blockade and subpressor Ang II infusion. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy Caucasian men and women, genotyped for the AGT1R polymorphism by polymerase chain reaction, were chosen to form two homogeneous groups: AA and AC/CC. Renal hemodynamic function was assessed with inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance before and after AGT1R receptor blockade with losartan and Ang II infusion. RESULTS: The mean values at baseline for glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (ERPF), and renal blood flow (RBF) were significantly lower in the AC/CC group compared with the AA group. Losartan increased the GFR and decreased the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the AC/CC group, but did not influence these parameters in the AA group. The aldosterone responses to losartan were blunted in the AA subgroup. During Ang II infusion, AC/CC subjects maintained GFR despite equivalent declines in RBF, suggesting an enhanced efferent arteriolar constrictive response. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that there is a relationship between the AGT1R A1166-->C polymorphism and the humoral and renal hemodynamic responses to AGT1R blockade and to Ang II infusion in the sodium-replete state, and that the C allele is associated with enhanced intrarenal and peripheral Ang II activity. Further studies are required to determine the genetic locus for this effect.
Authors: Harikiran Nistala; Sui Lee-Arteaga; Luca Carta; Jason R Cook; Silvia Smaldone; Gabriella Siciliano; Aaron N Rifkin; Harry C Dietz; Daniel B Rifkin; Francesco Ramirez Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Zudin Puthucheary; James R A Skipworth; Jai Rawal; Mike Loosemore; Ken Van Someren; Hugh E Montgomery Journal: Sports Med Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Bas J M Peters; Olaf H Klungel; Anthonius de Boer; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee Journal: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab Date: 2009-01
Authors: Martin Brunner; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Yan Gong; Jason H Karnes; Taimour Y Langaee; Carl J Pepine; Julie A Johnson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 2.778