Literature DB >> 19508983

Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men.

Navneet Singh1, Alan R Moody, David J Gladstone, General Leung, Radhakrishnan Ravikumar, James Zhan, Robert Maggisano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) in the carotid artery wall and the risk of future ipsilateral cerebrovascular events in men with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis by using a rapid three-dimensional T1-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo sequence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics review board approved this retrospective chart review and waived the requirement for written informed consent. All patients gave informed verbal consent at follow-up telephone interviews. Ninety-one men (mean age, 74.8 years; range, 47-88 years) who attended a vascular clinic between 2003 and 2006, who had asymptomatic carotid stenosis (50%-70% at Doppler ultrasonography), and who had undergone MR imaging for IPH detection were retrospectively identified. Seventy-five men with 98 eligible carotid arteries were included in the study. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (mean follow-up, 24.92 months; range, 12-43 months). Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to compare future ipsilateral cerebrovascular event rates between carotid arteries with and those without MR-depicted IPH.
RESULTS: Of the 98 carotid arteries included, 36 (36.7%) had MR-depicted IPH. Six cerebrovascular events (two strokes and four transient ischemic attacks) occurred in the carotid arteries with IPH, as compared with no clinical events in the carotid arteries without IPH. Univariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that MR-depicted IPH was associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 3.59; 95% confidence interval: 2.48, 4.71; P < .001). MR-depicted IPH negatively predicted outcomes (negative predictive value = 100%).
CONCLUSION: In this cohort with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis, MR-depicted IPH was associated with future ipsilateral cerebrovascular events. Conversely, patients without MR-depicted IPH remained asymptomatic during follow-up. The absence of IPH at MR imaging, therefore, may be a reassuring marker of plaque stability and of a lower risk of thromboembolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508983     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2522080792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  79 in total

1.  Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: a comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Xihai Zhao; Hunter R Underhill; Qian Zhao; Jianming Cai; Feiyu Li; Minako Oikawa; Li Dong; Hideki Ota; Thomas S Hatsukami; Baocheng Chu; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  New developments in clinical ischemic stroke prevention and treatment and their imaging implications.

Authors:  Jeremy J Heit; Max Wintermark
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  MRI of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Thomas Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Age-Specific Sex Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Depicted Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Bowen Zhang; Isabella Kaminski; Kush Kapur; Stephanie Chiu; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Medical and Revascularization Therapies for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Sushrut Dharmadhikari; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Does preoperative carotid stenosis screening reduce perioperative stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Khalil Masabni; Sajjad Raza; Eugene H Blackstone; Heather L Gornik; Joseph F Sabik
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Peter Börnert; Huilin Zhao; Daniel S Hippe; Xihai Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Progress in atherosclerotic plaque imaging.

Authors:  Giulia Soloperto; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

9.  Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging with Quantitative Vessel Wall T1 Mapping: Technical Development and Initial Experience.

Authors:  Haikun Qi; Jie Sun; Huiyu Qiao; Shuo Chen; Zechen Zhou; Xinlei Pan; Yishi Wang; Xihai Zhao; Rui Li; Chun Yuan; Huijun Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.