Literature DB >> 19508241

Using the optimal robust receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predictive genetic tests.

Qing Lu1, Nancy Obuchowski, Sungho Won, Xiaofeng Zhu, Robert C Elston.   

Abstract

Current ongoing genome-wide association (GWA) studies represent a powerful approach to uncover common unknown genetic variants causing common complex diseases. The discovery of these genetic variants offers an important opportunity for early disease prediction, prevention, and individualized treatment. We describe here a method of combining multiple genetic variants for early disease prediction, based on the optimality theory of the likelihood ratio (LR). Such theory simply shows that the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on the LR has maximum performance at each cutoff point and that the area under the ROC curve so obtained is highest among that of all approaches. Through simulations and a real data application, we compared it with the commonly used logistic regression and classification tree approaches. The three approaches show similar performance if we know the underlying disease model. However, for most common diseases we have little prior knowledge of the disease model and in this situation the new method has an advantage over logistic regression and classification tree approaches. We applied the new method to the type 1 diabetes GWA data from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Based on five single nucleotide polymorphisms, the test reaches medium level classification accuracy. With more genetic findings to be discovered in the future, we believe a predictive genetic test for type 1 diabetes can be successfully constructed and eventually implemented for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508241      PMCID: PMC3039874          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

Review 1.  The case for early detection.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Martin McIntosh; Stephen Schwartz; Brian Reid; Jerald Radich; Garnet Anderson; Leland Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy.

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Serge Koscielny; Catherine Hill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Medical genetics in the genomic medicine of the 21st century.

Authors:  Charles J Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai; Gary Longton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; E Kemper; T R Holford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Identifying genes that contribute most to good classification in microarrays.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Combining information from common type 2 diabetes risk polymorphisms improves disease prediction.

Authors:  Michael N Weedon; Mark I McCarthy; Graham Hitman; Mark Walker; Christopher J Groves; Eleftheria Zeggini; N William Rayner; Beverley Shields; Katharine R Owen; Andrew T Hattersley; Timothy M Frayling
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  8 in total

1.  A multi-locus predictiveness curve and its summary assessment for genetic risk prediction.

Authors:  Changshuai Wei; Ming Li; Yalu Wen; Chengyin Ye; Qing Lu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A likelihood ratio-based Mann-Whitney approach finds novel replicable joint gene action for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Changshuai Wei; Chengyin Ye; Ming Li; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Genotype-based risk and pharmacogenetic sampling in clinical trials.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Bagging optimal ROC curve method for predictive genetic tests, with an application for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Yuehua Cui; Chengyin Ye; Changshuai Wei; Robert C Elston
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Elad Ziv; Jeffrey A Tice; Brian Sprague; Celine M Vachon; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  iSS-PC: Identifying Splicing Sites via Physical-Chemical Properties Using Deep Sparse Auto-Encoder.

Authors:  Zhao-Chun Xu; Peng Wang; Wang-Ren Qiu; Xuan Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The effect of multiple genetic variants in predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Yeunjoo Song; Xuefeng Wang; Sungho Won; Yuehua Cui; Robert C Elston
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-12-15

8.  Sibling method increases risk assessment estimates for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Hoang V Lam; Dat T Nguyen; Cao D Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.