Literature DB >> 19507969

Interaural correlation and the binaural summation of loudness.

Barrie A Edmonds1, John F Culling.   

Abstract

The effect of interaural correlation (rho) on the loudness for noisebands was measured using a loudness-matching task in naive listeners. The task involved a sequence of loudness comparisons for which the intensity of one stimulus in a given comparison was varied using a one-up-one-down adaptive rule. The task provided an estimate of the level difference (in decibels) for which two stimulus conditions have equal loudness, giving measures of loudness difference in equivalent decibel units (dB(equiv)). Concurrent adaptive tracks measured loudness differences between rho=1, 0, and -1 and between these binaural stimuli and the monaural case for various noisebands. For all noisebands, monaural stimuli required approximately 6 dB higher levels than rho=1 for equal loudness. For most noisebands, rho=1 and rho=-1 were almost equal in loudness, with rho=-1 being slightly louder in the majority of measurements, while rho=0 was about 2 dB(equiv) louder than rho=1 or rho=-1. However, noisebands with significant high-frequency energy showed smaller differences: for 3745-4245 Hz, rho=0 was only about 0.85 dB(equiv) louder than rho=+/-1, and for 100-5000 Hz it was non-significantly louder (perhaps 0.7 dB(equiv)).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19507969     DOI: 10.1121/1.3120412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaural coherence for noise bands: waveforms and envelopes.

Authors:  Neil L Aaronson; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Generating partially correlated noise--a comparison of methods.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Yun Jin Cho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The perception of apparent auditory source width in hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Similar Impacts of the Interaural Delay and Interaural Correlation on Binaural Gap Detection.

Authors:  Lingzhi Kong; Zilong Xie; Lingxi Lu; Tianshu Qu; Xihong Wu; Jun Yan; Liang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Ajanth Varathanathan; Josef Schlittenlacher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises.

Authors:  Langchen Fan; Lingzhi Kong; Liang Li; Tianshu Qu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.