Literature DB >> 19506193

Use of a continuous probability scale to display visual field damage.

Michael Wall1, Chris A Johnson, Randy H Kardon, David P Crabb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To derive and display the percentile score (1st-99th percentile) at each perimetric location of a standard automated perimetry test to determine whether this technique will uncover patterns of loss not visible in standard (StatPac) probability maps.
METHODS: We computed continuous scale probability plots of data collected from testing 305 visually healthy participants with standard automated perimetry (24-2 Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm). The age-corrected thresholds were sorted by sensitivity at each visual field location. Percentiles were derived in single increments from the 1st to the 99th. We displayed the percentiles as a color scale and then interpreted visual field plots from healthy control subjects and patients with visual system disorders.
RESULTS: Added information was achieved for identifying patterns of visual loss by using the 5th- to 20th-percentile range in conjunction with the lower range below the 5th percentile that is typically used. The extent of contiguous regional defects appeared larger using this method. Healthy control subjects often have threshold results within the 5th- to 20th-percentile range, but these test locations usually appeared randomly spaced rather than in contiguous patterns commonly seen in patients at the border of visual field defects.
CONCLUSION: Continuous scale probability plots are a potentially useful adjunct for interpretation of perimetry results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506193     DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  8 in total

1.  Understanding disparities among diagnostic technologies in glaucoma.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07

2.  The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Improving glaucoma detection using spatially correspondent clusters of damage and by combining standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ali S Raza; Xian Zhang; Carlos G V De Moraes; Charles A Reisman; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: An approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Donald C Hood
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  The Nature of Macular Damage in Glaucoma as Revealed by Averaging Optical Coherence Tomography Data.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo V de Moraes; Chris A Johnson; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  Glaucomatous damage of the macula.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo V de Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Evaluation of a combined index of optic nerve structure and function for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael V Boland; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Luciana M Alencar; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.