Literature DB >> 19506001

Genomic features that predict allelic imbalance in humans suggest patterns of constraint on gene expression variation.

Jenny Tung1, Olivier Fédrigo, Ralph Haygood, Sayan Mukherjee, Gregory A Wray.   

Abstract

Variation in gene expression is an important contributor to phenotypic diversity within and between species. Although this variation often has a genetic component, identification of the genetic variants driving this relationship remains challenging. In particular, measurements of gene expression usually do not reveal whether the genetic basis for any observed variation lies in cis or in trans to the gene, a distinction that has direct relevance to the physical location of the underlying genetic variant, and which may also impact its evolutionary trajectory. Allelic imbalance measurements identify cis-acting genetic effects by assaying the relative contribution of the two alleles of a cis-regulatory region to gene expression within individuals. Identification of patterns that predict commonly imbalanced genes could therefore serve as a useful tool and also shed light on the evolution of cis-regulatory variation itself. Here, we show that sequence motifs, polymorphism levels, and divergence levels around a gene can be used to predict commonly imbalanced genes in a human data set. Reduction of this feature set to four factors revealed that only one factor significantly differentiated between commonly imbalanced and nonimbalanced genes. We demonstrate that these results are consistent between the original data set and a second published data set in humans obtained using different technical and statistical methods. Finally, we show that variation in the single allelic imbalance-associated factor is partially explained by the density of genes in the region of a target gene (allelic imbalance is less probable for genes in gene-dense regions), and, to a lesser extent, the evenness of expression of the gene across tissues and the magnitude of negative selection on putative regulatory regions of the gene. These results suggest that the genomic distribution of functional cis-regulatory variants in the human genome is nonrandom, perhaps due to local differences in evolutionary constraint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506001      PMCID: PMC2734157          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  71 in total

1.  The effects of selection against spurious transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Jason E Stajich; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Detection of regulatory variation in mouse genes.

Authors:  Christopher R Cowles; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Cis-acting variation in the expression of a high proportion of genes in human brain.

Authors:  Nicholas J Bray; Paul R Buckland; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  Scott A Rifkin; Junhyong Kim; Kevin P White
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Allelic variation in gene expression is common in the human genome.

Authors:  H Shuen Lo; Zhining Wang; Ying Hu; Howard H Yang; Sheryl Gere; Kenneth H Buetow; Maxwell P Lee
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A survey of genetic and epigenetic variation affecting human gene expression.

Authors:  Tomi Pastinen; Robert Sladek; Scott Gurd; Alya'a Sammak; Bing Ge; Pierre Lepage; Karine Lavergne; Amelie Villeneuve; Tiffany Gaudin; Helena Brändström; Allon Beck; Andrei Verner; Jade Kingsley; Eef Harmsen; Damian Labuda; Kenneth Morgan; Marie-Claude Vohl; Anna K Naumova; Daniel Sinnett; Thomas J Hudson
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Antonis Rokas; Victoria A Kassner; Thomas M Williams; Shu-Dan Yeh; John R True; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Gene expression profiles in the brain predict behavior in individual honey bees.

Authors:  Charles W Whitfield; Anne-Marie Cziko; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sequence information for the splicing of human pre-mRNA identified by support vector machine classification.

Authors:  Xiang H-F Zhang; Katherine A Heller; Ilana Hefter; Christina S Leslie; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Expression profiling in primates reveals a rapid evolution of human transcription factors.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Alicia Oshlack; Gordon K Smyth; Terence P Speed; Kevin P White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic architecture of regulatory variation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Andrew J Cal; Justin O Borevitz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Expression quantitative trait locus mapping across water availability environments reveals contrasting associations with genomic features in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  David B Lowry; Tierney L Logan; Luca Santuari; Christian S Hardtke; James H Richards; Leah J DeRose-Wilson; John K McKay; Saunak Sen; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Social environment influences the relationship between genotype and gene expression in wild baboons.

Authors:  Daniel E Runcie; Ralph T Wiedmann; Elizabeth A Archie; Jeanne Altmann; Gregory A Wray; Susan C Alberts; Jenny Tung
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman; Sonja S Skrovanek; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Assessing Loss of Regulatory Divergence, Genome-Transcriptome Incongruence, and Preferential Expression Switching in Abaca × Banana Backcrosses.

Authors:  Nelzo C Ereful; Antonio G Lalusin; Antonio C Laurena
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.141

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.