Literature DB >> 19504259

Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery.

Nobuaki Mizuguchi1, Masanori Sakamoto, Tetsuro Muraoka, Kazuyuki Kanosue.   

Abstract

We investigated whether corticospinal excitability during the imagery of an action involving an external object was influenced by actually touching the object. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle following transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex during imagery of squeezing a ball-with or without passively holding the ball. The MEPs amplitude during imagery when the ball was held was larger than that when the ball was not held. The MEPs amplitude was not modulated just by holding the ball. In the same experimental condition, the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to the stimulation of median nerve were not modulated by motor imagery or by holding the ball. These results suggest that the corticospinal excitability during imagery of squeezing a ball is enhanced with the real touch of the ball, and the enhancement would be caused by some changes along the corticospinal pathway itself and not by the change in responsiveness along the afferent pathway to the primary somatosensory cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19504259     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1875-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; B Brouwer; T S Miles; J B Pitcher; P D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

4.  Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-07

5.  Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

6.  Effects on median nerve SEPs of tactile stimulation applied to adjacent and remote areas of the body surface.

Authors:  R Kakigi; S J Jones
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-07

7.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle is dependent on different motor images.

Authors:  S Yahagi; T Kasai
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10

9.  Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  T Kasai; S Kawai; M Kawanishi; S Yahagi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. A review of scalp and intracranial recordings.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; C C Wood; S J Jones
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  12 in total

1.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Izumi Umehara; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Excitability of spinal neural function during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Toshiaki Suzuki; Yoshibumi Bunno; Chieko Onigata; Makiko Tani; Sayuri Uragami; Sohei Yoshida
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

3.  The modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of actions with objects.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Masanori Sakamoto; Tetsuro Muraoka; Kento Nakagawa; Shoichi Kanazawa; Hiroki Nakata; Noriyoshi Moriyama; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of somatosensory input on motor imagery depends upon motor imagery capability.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Takahiro Yamagishi; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-12

5.  Influence of motor imagery of isometric opponens pollicis activity on the excitability of spinal motor neurons: a comparison using different muscle contraction strengths.

Authors:  Yoshibumi Bunno; Yuko Yurugi; Chieko Onigata; Toshiaki Suzuki; Hiroyasu Iwatsuki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-07-30

6.  Effect of motor imagery on excitability of spinal neural function and its impact on the accuracy of movement-considering the point at which subjects subjectively determine the 50%MVC point.

Authors:  Yuki Fukumoto; Yoshibumi Bunno; Toshiaki Suzuki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

7.  Corticospinal excitability for hand muscles during motor imagery of foot changes with imagined force level.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Functional Equivalence of Imagined vs. Real Performance of an Inhibitory Task: An EEG/ERP Study.

Authors:  Santiago Galdo-Alvarez; Fidel M Bonilla; Alberto J González-Villar; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Enhanced Motor Imagery-Based BCI Performance via Tactile Stimulation on Unilateral Hand.

Authors:  Xiaokang Shu; Lin Yao; Xinjun Sheng; Dingguo Zhang; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Motor experience with a sport-specific implement affects motor imagery.

Authors:  Lanlan Zhang; Yanling Pi; Hua Zhu; Cheng Shen; Jian Zhang; Yin Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.