Literature DB >> 19502961

MELD score and blood product requirements during liver transplantation: no link.

Luc Massicotte1, Danielle Beaulieu, Jean-Denis Roy, Denis Marleau, Frank Vandenbroucke, Michel Dagenais, Réal Lapointe, André Roy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation has been traditionally associated with major blood loss and the need for allogenic blood product transfusions. In recent years, improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques have greatly decreased the amount of blood products transfused. We have published a median of 0 for all intraoperative blood products transfused. Some authors argue that these results could be possible merely because of the relatively healthy cohort in terms of model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. The MELD score could be adjusted by some conditions (hepatocellular carcinoma, hemodialysis, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and amyloidosis) and was not adjusted in these series. The goal of this work was to verify the MELD score according to US standards and to find any link between the MELD score and the transfusion rate.
METHOD: Three hundred fifty consecutive liver transplantations were studied. The MELD score was adjusted according to US standards. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median of the MELD score. Blood loss and transfusion rate were determined for these two groups. Logistic regression models were used to find any link with transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) units. RESULT: The MELD score before adjusting was 19+/-9 and 22+/-10 after. A mean of 0.5+/-1.3 RBC units/patient intraoperative were transfused with 80.6% of cases without any blood products. There was no difference for the blood loss (999+/-670 mL vs. 1017+/-885 mL) or the transfusion rate (0.4+/-1.2 vs. 0.5+/-1.4 RBC/patient) between two groups of MELD (<21 or >or=21) or any of its component (creatinine, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio). The logistic regression analysis found that only two variables were linked to RBC transfusion; starting hemoglobin value and phlebotomy.
CONCLUSION: In this series, the MELD score was as high as US series and did not predict blood losses and blood product requirement during liver transplantation. If the MELD system has to be implemented to prioritize orthotopic liver transplantation, it should be revisited, and the starting hemoglobin value should be added to the equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502961     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a5e5f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

1.  Massive blood transfusion after the first cut in liver transplantation predicts renal outcome and survival.

Authors:  Benedikt Reichert; Alexander Kaltenborn; Thomas Becker; Mario Schiffer; Jürgen Klempnauer; Harald Schrem
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Differential effects of plasma and red blood cell transfusions on acute lung injury and infection risk following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Alexander B Benson; James R Burton; Gregory L Austin; Scott W Biggins; Michael A Zimmerman; Igal Kam; Susan Mandell; Christopher C Silliman; Hugo Rosen; Marc Moss
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Blood loss, predictors of bleeding, transfusion practice and strategies of blood cell salvaging during liver transplantation.

Authors:  Paolo Feltracco; Marialuisa Brezzi; Stefania Barbieri; Helmut Galligioni; Moira Milevoj; Cristiana Carollo; Carlo Ori
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-27

Review 4.  Massive haemorrhage in liver transplantation: Consequences, prediction and management.

Authors:  Stuart Cleland; Carlos Corredor; Jia Jia Ye; Coimbatore Srinivas; Stuart A McCluskey
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 5.  Coagulopathy and transfusion therapy in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mirco Nacoti; Davide Corbella; Francesco Fazzi; Francesca Rapido; Ezio Bonanomi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Preoperative Thromboelastometry as a Predictor of Transfusion Requirements during Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Nirmeen Fayed; Wessam Mourad; Khaled Yassen; Klaus Görlinger
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Blood products and liver transplantation: A strategy to balance optimal preparation with effective blood stewardship.

Authors:  Christopher J Little; Glen E Leverson; Laura L Hammel; Joseph P Connor; David P Al-Adra
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?

Authors:  Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Sara Abdelhakam; Iman Montasser; Mohamed Bahaa; Hany Said; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08

Review 9.  Transfusion and coagulation management in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ben Clevenger; Susan V Mallett
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Risk Factors for Transfusion after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Ana Paula Hitomi Yokoyama; José Mauro Kutner; Araci Massami Sakashita; Cristiane Yoshie Nakazawa; Tatiana Almeida Omura de Paula; Raffael Perreira Cezar Zamper; Pamella Tung Pedroso; Marcio Dias de Almeida; Sergio Paiva Meira Filho; Fernanda Andrade Orsi
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.