Literature DB >> 16980115

5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study.

Bo Lagerqvist1, Steen Husted, Fredrik Kontny, Elisabeth Ståhle, Eva Swahn, Lars Wallentin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The FRISC-II invasive trial compared an early invasive with a non-invasive strategy in terms of death and myocardial infarction in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. We present 5-year follow-up results, overall and in subgroups based on recommended risk stratification criteria.
METHODS: In the FRISC-II trial, 2457 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were randomised to early invasive strategy (coronary angiography and, if appropriate, revascularisation, within 7 days from admission) or non-invasive primarily medical strategy. Risk stratification was done on the basis of risk indicators at randomisation: age older than 65 years, male sex, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, ST-segment depression, raised troponin concentration (>0.03 mug/L), and raised C-reactive protein or interleukin 6. Information on events after 24 months was taken from national registries. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis.
FINDINGS: At 5 years the groups differed in terms of the primary composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or both (invasive 217, 19.9 %; noninvasive 270, 24.5 %; risk ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.95; p=0.009). 5-year mortality was 117 (9.7%) in the invasive group compared with 124 (10.1%) in the noninvasive group (0.95; 0.75 -1.21; p=0.693). Rates of myocardial infarction were 141 (12.9 %) in the invasive and 195 (17.7%) in the non-invasive group (0.73; 0.60-0.89; p=0.002). The benefit of the invasive strategy was confined to male patients, non-smokers, and patients with two or more risk indicators.
INTERPRETATION: The 5-year outcome of this trial indicates sustained benefit of an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome at moderate to high risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16980115     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69416-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  35 in total

1.  Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Elias B Hanna; Anita Y Chen; Matthew T Roe; Stephen D Wiviott; Caroline S Fox; Jorge F Saucedo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 2.  Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Acute coronary syndromes: long-term impact of routine versus invasive ACS management.

Authors:  Charles V Pollack; George W Christy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction: is it time to reassess? Implications from the INSPIRE trial.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; Craig M Pratt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Early invasive strategy and outcomes of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: is time really the major determinant?

Authors:  Cristina Giglioli; Emanuele Cecchi; Daniele Landi; Serafina Valente; Marco Chiostri; Salvatore Mario Romano; Valentina Spini; Laura Perrotta; Ignazio Simonetti; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Impact of timing to coronary angiography in acute coronary syndrome on contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  Angela S Koh; Stanley Chia; Tan Jkb; Siti M Zaini; Guo Kwq; Yeo Kk; Chua Tsj; Tian Hai Koh; Jack W C Tan
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-07-25

Review 7.  Prognostic relevance of PCI-related myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pier Woudstra; Maik J Grundeken; Tim P van de Hoef; Lars Wallentin; Keith A Fox; Robbert J de Winter; Peter Damman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Coronary intervention in diabetes: is it different.

Authors:  Amit Malviya; Animesh Mishra
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  The role of invasive therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  José C Nicolau; Pedro A Lemos; Maurício Wajngarten; Roberto R Giraldez; Carlos V Serrano; Eulógio E Martinez; Luciano M Baracioli; Roberto Kalil; Fábio B Jatene; Luis A Dallan; Luis B Puig; Noedir A Stolf
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Management of patients with unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a critical review of the 2007 ACC /AHA guidelines.

Authors:  J Hoekstra; M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.