Literature DB >> 19502449

Cytopathological effects of Bacillus sphaericus Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa toxin on binary toxin-susceptible and -resistant Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.

Janaina Viana de Melo1, Gareth Wyn Jones, Colin Berry, Romero Henrique Teixeira Vasconcelos, Cláudia Maria Fontes de Oliveira, André Freire Furtado, Christina Alves Peixoto, Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha.   

Abstract

The Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa mosquitocidal two-component toxin was recently characterized from Bacillus sphaericus strain IAB59 and is uniquely composed of a three-domain Cry protein toxin (Cry48Aa) and a binary (Bin) toxin-like protein (Cry49Aa). Its mode of action has not been elucidated, but a remarkable feature of this protein is the high toxicity against species from the Culex complex, besides its capacity to overcome Culex resistance to the Bin toxin, the major insecticidal factor in B. sphaericus-based larvicides. The goal of this work was to investigate the ultrastructural effects of Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa on midgut cells of Bin-toxin-susceptible and -resistant Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. The major cytopathological effects observed after Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa treatment were intense mitochondrial vacuolation, breakdown of endoplasmic reticulum, production of cytoplasmic vacuoles, and microvillus disruption. These effects were similar in Bin-toxin-susceptible and -resistant larvae and demonstrated that Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa toxin interacts with and displays toxic effects on cells lacking receptors for the Bin toxin, while B. sphaericus IAB59-resistant larvae did not show mortality after treatment with Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa toxin. The cytopathological alterations in Bin-toxin-resistant larvae provoked by Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa treatment were similar to those observed when larvae were exposed to a synergistic mixture of Bin/Cry11Aa toxins. Such effects seemed to result from a combined action of Cry-like and Bin-like toxins. The complex effects caused by Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa provide evidence for the potential of these toxins as active ingredients of a new generation of biolarvicides that conjugate insecticidal factors with distinct sites of action, in order to manage mosquito resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502449      PMCID: PMC2708442          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00811-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  25 in total

1.  Permeabilization of model lipid membranes by Bacillus sphaericus mosquitocidal binary toxin and its individual components.

Authors:  J L Schwartz; L Potvin; F Coux; J F Charles; C Berry; M J Humphreys; A F Jones; I Bernhart; M Dalla Serra; G Menestrina
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Evolution of resistance toward Bacillus sphaericus or a mixture of B. sphaericus+Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis, in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Margaret C Wirth; Joshua A Jiannino; Brian A Federici; William E Walton
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Synergy between toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Margaret C Wirth; Joshua A Jiannino; Brian A Federici; William E Walton
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Generalized transduction in Bacillus thuringiensis var. berliner 1715 using bacteriophage CP-54Ber.

Authors:  M M Lecadet; M O Blondel; J Ribier
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1980-11

5.  Influence of Exposure to Single versus Multiple Toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis on Development of Resistance in the Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  G P Georghiou; M C Wirth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Cross-resistance between strains of Bacillus sphaericus but not B. thuringiensis israelensis in colonies of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Z M Yuan; G F Pei; L Regis; C Nielsen-Leroux; Q X Cai
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.739

7.  Mtx toxins synergize Bacillus sphaericus and Cry11Aa against susceptible and insecticide-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.

Authors:  Margaret C Wirth; Yangkun Yang; William E Walton; Brian A Federici; Colin Berry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A new Cry toxin with a unique two-component dependency from Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Gareth W Jones; Christina Nielsen-Leroux; Yankun Yang; Zhiming Yuan; Vinícius Fiúza Dumas; Rose Gomes Monnerat; Colin Berry
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  High resistance to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin in culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): the complex situation of west Mediterranean countries.

Authors:  Christina Nielsen-Leroux; Nicole Pasteur; Jérĵme Prètre; Jean-François Charles; Hassen Ben Sheikh; Christine Chevillon
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  The Cry48Aa-Cry49Aa binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus exhibits highly restricted target specificity.

Authors:  Gareth W Jones; Margaret C Wirth; Rose G Monnerat; Colin Berry
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.491

View more
  6 in total

1.  Functional Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt1Aa Is Necessary To Synergize Lysinibacillus sphaericus Binary Toxin (Bin) against Bin-Resistant and -Refractory Mosquito Species.

Authors:  Nathaly Alexandre Nascimento; Mary Carmen Torres-Quintero; Samira López Molina; Sabino Pacheco; Tatiany Patrícia Romão; Antonio Pereira-Neves; Mario Soberón; Alejandra Bravo; Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Properties and applied use of the mosquitocidal bacterium, Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Hyun-Woo Park; Dennis K Bideshi; Brian A Federici
Journal:  J Asia Pac Entomol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin elicits host cell autophagy as a response to intoxication.

Authors:  Onya Opota; Nils C Gauthier; Anne Doye; Colin Berry; Pierre Gounon; Emmanuel Lemichez; David Pauron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental Variations in Mycobacterium ulcerans Transcriptome: Absence of Mycolactone Expression in Suboptimal Environments.

Authors:  Daniel Sanhueza; Jean-François Guégan; Heather Jordan; Christine Chevillon
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  A differential transcriptional profile by Culex quinquefasciatus larvae resistant to Lysinibacillus sphaericus IAB59 highlights genes and pathways associated with the resistance phenotype.

Authors:  Tatiana Maria Teodoro Rezende; Antonio Mauro Rezende; Gabriel Luz Wallau; Crhisllane Rafaele Santos Vasconcelos; Osvaldo Pompílio de-Melo-Neto; Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha; Tatiany Patrícia Romão
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 6.  Bacterial Toxins Active against Mosquitoes: Mode of Action and Resistance.

Authors:  Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha; Tatiany Patricia Romão; Tatiana Maria Teodoro Rezende; Karine da Silva Carvalho; Heverly Suzany Gouveia de Menezes; Nathaly Alexandre do Nascimento; Mario Soberón; Alejandra Bravo
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.