Literature DB >> 15766932

Evolution of resistance toward Bacillus sphaericus or a mixture of B. sphaericus+Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis, in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Margaret C Wirth1, Joshua A Jiannino, Brian A Federici, William E Walton.   

Abstract

The 2362 strain of Bacillus sphaericus (Bs) Neide is a highly mosquitocidal bacterium used in commercial bacterial larvicides primarily to control mosquitoes of the genus Culex. Unfortunately, Bs is at high risk for selecting resistance in mosquito populations, because its binary toxin apparently only binds to a single receptor type on midgut microvilli. A potential key strategy for delaying resistance to insecticidal proteins is to use mixtures of toxins that act at different targets within the insect, especially mixtures that interact synergistically. We tested this hypothesis for delaying the phenotypic expression of resistance by exposing Culex quinquefasciatus Say larvae to Bs alone or in combination with Cyt1A from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Two laboratory lines of Cx. quinquefasciatus, one sensitive to Bs and the other containing Bs resistance alleles, were subjected to intensive selection pressure for 20 generations with either Bs 2362 or a 3:1 mixture of Bs 2362+Cyt1A. At the end of the study, the sensitive line had evolved >1000-fold resistance when selected with Bs alone, whereas the parallel line selected with Bs+Cyt1A exhibited only low resistance toward this mixture (RR95, 1.4). Similar results were observed in the lines containing Bs resistance alleles. Both lines selected with Bs+Cyt1A exhibited substantial resistance to Bs in the absence of Cyt1A. Although selection with Bs+Cyt1A did not prevent the underlying evolution of resistance to Bs, these results suggest that a mixture of Bs with other endotoxins, particularly one like Bs+Cyt1A in which the components interact synergistically, will provide longer lasting and more effective mosquito control than Bs alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15766932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2005.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol        ISSN: 0022-2011            Impact factor:   2.841


  8 in total

1.  Evolution of Resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) Selected With a Recombinant Bacillus thuringiensis Strain-Producing Cyt1Aa and Cry11Ba, and the Binary Toxin, Bin, From Lysinibacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Margaret C Wirth; William E Walton; Brian A Federici
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Decreased toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis to mosquito larvae after contact with leaf litter.

Authors:  Guillaume Tetreau; Renaud Stalinski; Dylann Kersusan; Sylvie Veyrenc; Jean-Philippe David; Stéphane Reynaud; Laurence Després
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Co-expression of the mosquitocidal toxins Cyt1Aa and Cry11Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Asticcacaulis excentricus.

Authors:  Dasheng Zheng; Norma Adriana Valdez-Cruz; Gemma Armengol; Chloe Sevrez; Jose Maurilio Munoz-Olaya; Zhiming Yuan; Sergio Orduz; Neil Crickmore
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Fate of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in the field: evidence for spore recycling and differential persistence of toxins in leaf litter.

Authors:  Guillaume Tetreau; Mattia Alessi; Sylvie Veyrenc; Sophie Périgon; Jean-Philippe David; Stéphane Reynaud; Laurence Després
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Mtx toxins synergize Bacillus sphaericus and Cry11Aa against susceptible and insecticide-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.

Authors:  Margaret C Wirth; Yangkun Yang; William E Walton; Brian A Federici; Colin Berry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Cytopathological effects of Bacillus sphaericus Cry48Aa/Cry49Aa toxin on binary toxin-susceptible and -resistant Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.

Authors:  Janaina Viana de Melo; Gareth Wyn Jones; Colin Berry; Romero Henrique Teixeira Vasconcelos; Cláudia Maria Fontes de Oliveira; André Freire Furtado; Christina Alves Peixoto; Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics.

Authors:  Khem Raj Meena; Shamsher S Kanwar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Enterococcus durans with mosquito larvicidal toxicity against Culex quinquefasciatus, elucidated using a Proteomic and Metabolomic approach.

Authors:  Domnic Colvin; Vishnu Dhuri; Hirday Verma; Rama Lokhande; Avinash Kale
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.