Literature DB >> 19501066

Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.

Anna Schubö1, Hermann J Müller.   

Abstract

There are two strategies for selecting relevant information from a visual scene: according to either its salience or its relevance for behavioral goals. Although there is broad evidence for the existence of both mechanisms, there has been a debate concerning the impact of top-down control on salience-based selection. We investigated whether salient but irrelevant information is filtered by the visual system and what role the organization of the visual system plays in selection. Using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we compared processing of the same salient objects when relevant versus irrelevant to the task at hand. Observers had to detect a target singleton defined in a specific dimension (e.g., orientation), while ignoring a singleton non-target defined in either another dimension (e.g., color; Experiment 1, requiring dimension-based search) or the same dimension (Experiment 2, requiring feature-based search). For dimension-based search, the results revealed an enhanced posterior N2, indicative of singleton selection, and an enhanced P3 for target singletons, but no difference between non-target singletons defined in another dimension and blank trials. Also, N2pc results indicated that the allocation of attention was modulated by the task. In contrast, for feature-based search, some ERP enhancement was also observed for non-target singletons (defined in the same dimension as the target) in the N2, N2pc, and P3 latency ranges. This pattern argues in favor of a strong top-down influence on singleton selection that operates on dimensions rather than features.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501066     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  4 in total

1.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Neural basis of feature-based contextual effects on visual search behavior.

Authors:  Kelly Shen; Martin Paré
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Attentional spreading to task-irrelevant object features: experimental support and a 3-step model of attention for object-based selection and feature-based processing modulation.

Authors:  Detlef Wegener; Fingal Orlando Galashan; Maike Kathrin Aurich; Andreas Kurt Kreiter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.