Literature DB >> 19500236

The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.

Elizabeta Evtimovska1, Radi Masri, Carl F Driscoll, Elaine Romberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine early changes in retentive values of implant overdenture attachments during multiple pulls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implant attachment systems (Hader bar and clip, Locator system) were used in this study. The experimental groups were divided into yellow Hader clips, white Locator attachments, and green Locator attachments. Each group consisted of 21 matrix attachments. The attachments were placed into a custom-made acrylic resin block seated passively on another acrylic block containing a Hader bar or two Locator abutments with different angulations. Each attachment was subjected to 20 consecutive pulls using a universal testing machine. The peak load-to-dislodgement of the attachments after each pull was documented, and the percent reduction of the peak load-to-dislodgement was calculated. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used for data analyses. A p < or = 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the percent reduction in peak load-to-dislodgement between the attachments after the first pull (p= 0.005) and after the final pull (p= 0.0001). The yellow Hader clips exhibited the least percent reduction in peak load-to-dislodgement (6.50 +/- 3.59%) after the first pull, followed by the white Locator attachments (8.60 +/- 4.42%); the green Locator attachments exhibited the greatest reduction (11.05 +/- 4.94%).
CONCLUSION: The results of this in vitro study demonstrate that retentive values of the Locator attachments are reduced significantly after multiple pulls. Although this reduction might not be noticeable to the patient, it is recommended that the clinician place and remove the overdenture multiple times before delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19500236     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00474.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  17 in total

1.  Stud attachments for the mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Prosthetic complications. A literature review.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-02-06

2.  Locator® versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses.

Authors:  Silvia Brandt; Jan Brandt; Ali-Reza Ketabi; Hans-Christoph Lauer; Anna Kunzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Ali M El-Sheikh; Omar F Shihabuddin; Sahar M F Ghoraba
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-18

4.  The Effects of Denture Cleansing Solutions on the Retention of Attachments of Implant Supported Overdentures.

Authors:  Reza Derafshi; Mina Mohaghegh; Maryam Saki; Anahita Safari; Mohammad Rabee Haghighi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  The influence of saliva pH value on the retention and durability of bar-clip attachments.

Authors:  Antonio Sergio Silva; Carlos Aroso; Raul Ustrell; Ana Cristina Braga; Jose Manuel Mendes; Tomas Escuin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Stress distribution patterns of implant supported overdentures-analog versus finite element analysis: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Soumyadev Satpathy; C L Satish Babu; Shilpa Shetty; Bharat Raj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  In vitro retention force measurement for three different attachment systems for implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Kareem Mohammed Reda; Ibrahim Ramadan El-Torky; Mohamed Nabeel El-Gendy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

9.  An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.

Authors:  Tejomaya Shastry; N M Anupama; Shilpa Shetty; M Nalinakshamma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Strains around distally inclined implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Moustafa Abdou Elsyad; Fathi Abo Setta; Ahmed Samir Khirallah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.