Literature DB >> 19499864

Ease of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion and its fibreoptic view after placement using Gum Elastic Bougie: a comparison with conventional techniques.

S Taneja1, M Agarwalt, J S Dali, G Agrawal.   

Abstract

The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) is routinely inserted by the digital and introducer tool techniques but a newer Gum Elastic Bougie (GEB) guided insertion technique has been described. The aims and objectives were to compare the ease of PLMA insertion and fibreoptic view of PLMA after placement using GEB and conventional techniques. Ninety-six ASA I or II patients of either gender aged 18 to 60 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia in the supine position were included in this study. Following induction of anaesthesia, a PLMA was inserted using a GEB, introducer tool or digital technique in Groups G, I and D respectively (n = 32). Correct placement of the PLMA was confirmed by using clinical tests along with fibreoptic assessment. Ease of PLMA insertion was assessed by the number of attempts, time taken and number of patients requiring lateral approach for insertion. The fibreoptic view of PLMA placement through the airway tube was graded on a scale from 4 (best view) to 1 (worst view). GEB-guided PLMA insertion was more successful both after the first attempt (G 100%, I 69%, D 72%, P < 0.01) and after two attempts (G 100%, I 78%, D 84%, P < 0.05). Time taken for successful placement was significantly shorter in the GEB-guided group after two attempts (G 22 +/- 2 seconds, I 31.9 +/- 18.8 seconds, D 29.5 +/- 18.6 seconds, P < 0.05). The fibreoptic view through the airway tube was significantly better in the GEB-guided group (P < 0.01). Incidence of trauma was significantly less in the GEB-guided group (P < 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499864     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0903700306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  7 in total

1.  Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mao-Kai Chen; Hung-Te Hsu; I-Cheng Lu; Chih-Kai Shih; Ya-Chun Shen; Kuang-Yi Tseng; Kuang-I Cheng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 2.  Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Pavel Michalek; William Donaldson; Eliska Vobrubova; Marek Hakl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Ease and Safety of Securing Airway by Railroading ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway over Bougie versus Traditional Digital Insertion Technique.

Authors:  Pulak Tosh; Sunil Rajan; Naina Narayani; Lakshmi Kumar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-11-07

4.  Validation of the unassisted, gum-elastic bougie-guided, laryngeal mask airway-ProSeal™ placement technique in anaesthetized patients.

Authors:  Aaron M Joffe; Kristopher M Schroeder; John A Shepler; Richard E Galgon
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-05

5.  Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians.

Authors:  Valter Perilli; Paola Aceto; Teresa Sacco; Nunzia Martella; Maria Teresa Cazzato; Liliana Sollazzi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01

6.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.