Literature DB >> 19499656

First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.

V Tomulescu1, O Stănciulea, I Bălescu, S Vasile, St Tudor, C Gheorghe, C Vasilescu, I Popescu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery was developed in response to the limitations and drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery. Since 1997 when the first robotic procedure was performed various papers pointed the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, this technique is now a reality and it will probably become the surgery of the future. The aim of this paper is to present our preliminary experience with the three-arms "da Vinci S surgical system", to assess the feasibility of this technique in various abdominal and thoracic procedures and to point out the advantages of the robotic approach for each type of procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 18 January 2008 and 18 January 2009 153 patients (66 men and 87 women; mean age 48,02 years, range 6 to 84 years) underwent robotic-assisted surgical procedures in our institution; we performed 129 abdominal and 24 thoracic procedures, as follows: one cholecystectomy, 14 myotomies with Dor fundoplication, one gastroenteroanastomosis for unresectable antral gastric cancer, one transthoracic esophagectomy, 14 gastrectomies, one polypectomy through gastrotomy, 22 splenectomies,7 partial spleen resections, 22 thymectomy, 6 Nissen fundoplications, one Toupet fundoplication, one choledocho-duodeno-anastomosis, one drainage for pancreatic abscess, one distal pancreatectomy, one hepatic cyst fenestration, 7 hepatic resections, 29 colonic and rectal resections, 5 adrenalectomies, 12 total radical hysterectomies and pelvic lymphadenectomy, 3 hysterectomies with bilateral adnexectomy for uterine fibroma, one unilateral adnexectomy, and 2 cases of cervico-mediastinal goitre resection.
RESULTS: 147 procedures were robotics completed , whereas 6 procedures were converted to open surgery due to the extent of the lesion. Average operating room time was 171 minutes (range 60 to 600 minutes, Median length of stay was 8,6 days (range 2 to 48 days). One system malfunctions was registered. Post-operatory complications occurred in 14 cases. There were no deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience suggests that robotic surgery is feasible and worth of clinical application. The best indications for robotic surgery are the procedures that require a small operating field, a fine a precise dissection (suitable for pelvic and gastric lymphadenectomy, nerve sparing in total mesorectal excision) and safe intracorporeal sutures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)        ISSN: 1221-9118


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach.

Authors:  Catalin Vasilescu; Oana Stanciulea; Stefan Tudor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Olivia Sgarbura; Catalin Vasilescu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  State of the art of robotic thymectomy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ismail; Marc Swierzy; Jens C Rückert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taaichi Kawamura; Yuichiro Miki; Rie Makuuchi; Shinsaku Honda; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Wataru Takagi; Hayato Omori; Fumiko Hirata
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  [Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version].

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies.

Authors:  Carolijn L Nota; Inne H Borel Rinkes; Izaak Q Molenaar; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Yuman Fong; Jeroen Hagendoorn
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections?

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; Allan Tsung
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 9.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Jie Shu; Xiao-Jun Wang; Jian-Wei Li; Ping Bie; Jian Chen; Shu-Guo Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.