Literature DB >> 19498082

Achieving accurate compound concentration in cell-based screening: validation of acoustic droplet ejection technology.

Richard John Grant1, Karen Roberts, Carly Pointon, Clare Hodgson, Lynsey Womersley, Darren Craig Jones, Eric Tang.   

Abstract

Compound handling is a fundamental and critical step in compound screening throughout the drug discovery process. Although most compound-handling processes within compound management facilities use 100% DMSO solvent, conventional methods of manual or robotic liquid-handling systems in screening workflows often perform dilutions in aqueous solutions to maintain solvent tolerance of the biological assay. However, the use of aqueous media in these applications can lead to suboptimal data quality due to compound carryover or precipitation during the dilution steps. In cell-based assays, this effect is worsened by the unpredictable physical characteristics of compounds and the low DMSO tolerance within the assay. In some cases, the conventional approaches using manual or automated liquid handling resulted in variable IC(50) dose responses. This study examines the cause of this variability and evaluates the accuracy of screening data in these case studies. A number of liquid-handling options have been explored to address the issues and establish a generic compound-handling workflow to support cell-based screening across our screening functions. The authors discuss the validation of the Labcyte Echo reformatter as an effective noncontact solution for generic compound-handling applications against diverse compound classes using triple-quad liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The successful validation and implementation challenges of this technology for direct dosing onto cells in cell-based screening is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19498082     DOI: 10.1177/1087057109336588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  7 in total

1.  Rapid generation of multiplexed cell cocultures using acoustic droplet ejection followed by aqueous two-phase exclusion patterning.

Authors:  Yu Fang; John P Frampton; Shreya Raghavan; Rahman Sabahi-Kaviani; Gary Luker; Cheri X Deng; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Automated Acoustic Dispensing for the Serial Dilution of Peptide Agonists in Potency Determination Assays.

Authors:  Jacqueline Naylor; Alessandra Rossi; Christopher Brankin; David C Hornigold
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  An alternative direct compound dispensing method using the HP D300 digital dispenser.

Authors:  Raisa E Jones; Wei Zheng; John C McKew; Catherine Z Chen
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2013-05-24

4.  Digitally programmable microfluidic automaton for multiscale combinatorial mixing and sample processing.

Authors:  Erik C Jensen; Amanda M Stockton; Thomas N Chiesl; Jungkyu Kim; Abhisek Bera; Richard A Mathies
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Modeling error in experimental assays using the bootstrap principle: understanding discrepancies between assays using different dispensing technologies.

Authors:  Sonya M Hanson; Sean Ekins; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Dispensing processes impact apparent biological activity as determined by computational and statistical analyses.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Joe Olechno; Antony J Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Current status and future directions of high-throughput ADME screening in drug discovery.

Authors:  Wilson Z Shou
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2020-05-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.