BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis are systemic disorders, but are often characterised by segmental involvement and complications. A potential mechanism for local involvement early in the disease process may be related to plaque composition. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that in patients with minimal coronary atherosclerosis, coronary artery segments with abnormal endothelial function have specific plaque characteristics. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained from 30 patients who underwent coronary endothelial function assessment. Spectral analysis of the IVUS radiofrequency data was used for assessment of plaque composition. IVUS findings of the coronary sections were compared according to the corresponding endothelial response to acetylcholine. RESULTS: Sections with a decrease epicardial coronary arterial diameter in response to acetylcholine had smaller baseline lumen (7.5 (2.4) mm(2) vs 8.8 (3.3) mm(2), p = 0.006) but larger plaque burden (37.1% (9.4%) vs 31% (7%), p = 0.003) than sections with normal endothelial response. Sections with endothelial dysfunction had larger necrotic core plaques: 0.13 (0.03-0.33) mm(2) vs 0.0 (0.0-0.07), p<0.001 and more dense calcium: 0.03 (IQR 0.0-0.13) mm(2) vs 0.0 (0.0-0.10) mm(2), p<0.01), than those with normal endothelial response. Only necrotic core area was associated with endothelial dysfunction (p<0.001) after adjusting for other measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that local coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with minimal coronary atherosclerosis is associated with plaque characteristics that are typical of vulnerable plaques.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis are systemic disorders, but are often characterised by segmental involvement and complications. A potential mechanism for local involvement early in the disease process may be related to plaque composition. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that in patients with minimal coronary atherosclerosis, coronary artery segments with abnormal endothelial function have specific plaque characteristics. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained from 30 patients who underwent coronary endothelial function assessment. Spectral analysis of the IVUS radiofrequency data was used for assessment of plaque composition. IVUS findings of the coronary sections were compared according to the corresponding endothelial response to acetylcholine. RESULTS: Sections with a decrease epicardial coronary arterial diameter in response to acetylcholine had smaller baseline lumen (7.5 (2.4) mm(2) vs 8.8 (3.3) mm(2), p = 0.006) but larger plaque burden (37.1% (9.4%) vs 31% (7%), p = 0.003) than sections with normal endothelial response. Sections with endothelial dysfunction had larger necrotic core plaques: 0.13 (0.03-0.33) mm(2) vs 0.0 (0.0-0.07), p<0.001 and more dense calcium: 0.03 (IQR 0.0-0.13) mm(2) vs 0.0 (0.0-0.10) mm(2), p<0.01), than those with normal endothelial response. Only necrotic core area was associated with endothelial dysfunction (p<0.001) after adjusting for other measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that local coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with minimal coronary atherosclerosis is associated with plaque characteristics that are typical of vulnerable plaques.
Authors: G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anuja Nair; Barry D Kuban; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; D Geoffrey Vince Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Edward B Diethrich; M Pauliina Margolis; Donald B Reid; Allen Burke; Venkatesh Ramaiah; Julio A Rodriguez-Lopez; Grayson Wheatley; Dawn Olsen; Renu Virmani Journal: J Endovasc Ther Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: S F Davis; A C Yeung; I T Meredith; F Charbonneau; P Ganz; A P Selwyn; T J Anderson Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lakshmana K Pendyala; Jinsheng Li; Toshiro Shinke; Sarah Geva; Xinhua Yin; Jack P Chen; Spencer B King; Keith A Robinson; Nicolas A F Chronos; Dongming Hou Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Haim Shmilovich; Victor Y Cheng; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Louise E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2011-08-07 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Julia Collin; Mario Gössl; Yoshiki Matsuo; Rebecca R Cilluffo; Andreas J Flammer; Darrell Loeffler; Ryan J Lennon; Robert D Simari; Daniel B Spoon; Raimund Erbel; Lilach O Lerman; Sundeep Khosla; Amir Lerman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 4.164