Literature DB >> 19497820

Influence of feedback parameters on performance of a vibrotactile balance prosthesis.

Adam D Goodworth1, Conrad Wall, Robert J Peterka.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of feedback conditions on the effectiveness of a balance prosthesis. The balance prosthesis used an array of 12 tactile vibrators (tactors) placed on the anterior and posterior surfaces of the torso to provide body orientation feedback related to several different combinations of angular position and velocity of body sway in the sagittal plane. Control tests were performed with no tactor activation. Body sway was evoked in subjects with normal sensory function by rotating the support surface upon which subjects stood with eyes closed. Body sway was analyzed by computing root mean square sway measures and by a frequency-response function analysis that characterized the amplitude (gain) and timing (phase) of body sway over a frequency range of 0.017-2.2 Hz. Root mean square sway measures showed a reduction of surface stimulus evoked body sway for most vibrotactile feedback settings compared to control conditions. However, frequency-response function analysis showed that the sway reduction was due primarily to a reduction in sway below about 0.5 Hz, whereas there was actually an enhancement of sway above 0.6 Hz. Finally, we created a postural model that accounted for the experimental results and gave insight into how vibrotactile information was incorporated into the postural control system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497820      PMCID: PMC2726898          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  14 in total

1.  Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Balance prostheses for postural control.

Authors:  Conrad Wall; Marc S Weinberg
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

3.  Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis.

Authors:  Prajoy P Kadkade; Brian J Benda; Patricia B Schmidt; Conrad Wall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Vibrating insoles and balance control in elderly people.

Authors:  Attila A Priplata; James B Niemi; Jason D Harry; Lewis A Lipsitz; James J Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effects of practicing tandem gait with and without vibrotactile biofeedback in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Marco Dozza; Conrad Wall; Robert J Peterka; Lorenzo Chiari; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Stimulus-dependent changes in the vestibular contribution to human postural control.

Authors:  Massimo Cenciarini; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Using vibrotactile feedback of instability to trigger a forward compensatory stepping response.

Authors:  François Asseman; Adolfo M Bronstein; Michael A Gresty
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Haggerty; Liang-Ting Jiang; Andrzej Galecki; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Sensorimotor integration for multisegmental frontal plane balance control in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Influence of stance width on frontal plane postural dynamics and coordination in human balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stance width changes how sensory feedback is used for multisegmental balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Patricia Mellodge; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of age on postural and cognitive task performance while using vibrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Loughlin; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern; Kathleen H Sienko; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Kristin M Quick; Jessica L Mischel; Patrick J Loughlin; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli.

Authors:  Matthew J Leineweber; Sam Shi; Jan Andrysek
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  The Use of Vibrotactile Feedback During Dual-Task Standing Balance Conditions in People With Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Loughlin; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern; Kathleen H Sienko; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Postural compensation for vestibular loss and implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fay B Horak
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  Postural compensation for vestibular loss.

Authors:  Fay B Horak
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.