Literature DB >> 24760788

Stance width changes how sensory feedback is used for multisegmental balance control.

Adam D Goodworth1, Patricia Mellodge2, Robert J Peterka3.   

Abstract

A multilink sensorimotor integration model of frontal plane balance control was developed to determine how stance width influences the use of sensory feedback in healthy adults. Data used to estimate model parameters came from seven human participants who stood on a continuously rotating surface with three different stimulus amplitudes, with eyes open and closed, and at four different stance widths. Dependent variables included lower body (LB) and upper body (UB) sway quantified by frequency-response functions. Results showed that stance width had a major influence on how parameters varied across stimulus amplitude and between visual conditions. Active mechanisms dominated LB control. At narrower stances, with increasing stimulus amplitude, subjects used sensory reweighting to shift reliance from proprioceptive cues to vestibular and/or visual cues that oriented the LB more toward upright. When vision was available, subjects reduced reliance on proprioception and increased reliance on vision. At wider stances, LB control did not exhibit sensory reweighting. In the UB system, both active and passive mechanisms contributed and were dependent on stance width. UB control changed across stimulus amplitude most in wide stance (opposite of the pattern found in LB control). The strong influence of stance width on sensory integration and neural feedback control implies that rehabilitative therapies for balance disorders can target different aspects of balance control by using different stance widths. Rehabilitative strategies designed to assess or modify sensory reweighting will be most effective with the use of narrower stances, whereas wider stances present greater challenges to UB control.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balance; frontal plane; sensorimotor model; sensory feedback; stance width

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760788      PMCID: PMC4122700          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00490.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sensorimotor integration for multisegmental frontal plane balance control in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Diana Dimitrova; John G Nutt
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Incorporating voluntary unilateral knee flexion into balance corrections elicited by multi-directional perturbations to stance.

Authors:  U M Küng; C G C Horlings; F Honegger; J H J Allum
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  A robotic device for understanding neuromechanical interactions during standing balance control.

Authors:  J E Scrivens; S P Deweerth; L H Ting
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.956

6.  Stability in a frontal plane model of balance requires coupled changes to postural configuration and neural feedback control.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Bingham; Julia T Choi; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Broad directional tuning in spinal projections to the cerebellum.

Authors:  G Bosco; R E Poppele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effect of vision and stance width on human body motion when standing: implications for afferent control of lateral sway.

Authors:  B L Day; M J Steiger; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Falls prediction in elderly people: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jaap Swanenburg; Eling D de Bruin; Daniel Uebelhart; Theo Mulder
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  Cerebellar encoding of limb position.

Authors:  Antonino Casabona; Maria Stella Valle; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Perciavalle
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.648

View more
  12 in total

1.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Identifying mechanisms of stance control: A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Influence of stance width on standing balance in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Schmidle; Alexandra Charlotte de Crignis; Manuela Stürzer; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Klaus Jahn; Carmen Krewer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy delays responses to lateral balance perturbations regardless of predictability.

Authors:  T F Boerger; L McGinn; M C Wang; B D Schmit; A S Hyngstrom
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Standing horse posture: a longer stance is more stable.

Authors:  Karen Gellman; Andy Ruina
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.643

6.  The generation of centripetal force when walking in a circle: insight from the distribution of ground reaction forces recorded by plantar insoles.

Authors:  Anna Maria Turcato; Marco Godi; Andrea Giordano; Marco Schieppati; Antonio Nardone
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  The Neuro-Mechanical Processes That Underlie Goal-Directed Medio-Lateral APA during Gait Initiation.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati; Oscar Crisafulli; Manh-Cuong Do
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Larger Head Displacement to Optic Flow Presented in the Lower Visual Field.

Authors:  Kanon Fujimoto; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-11-22

9.  The association of reactive balance control and spinal curvature under lumbar muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Erika Zemková; Alena Cepková; José M Muyor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Pax2-Islet1 Transgenic Mice Are Hyperactive and Have Altered Cerebellar Foliation.

Authors:  Romana Bohuslavova; Nicole Dodd; Iva Macova; Tetyana Chumak; Martin Horak; Josef Syka; Bernd Fritzsch; Gabriela Pavlinkova
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.