Literature DB >> 19497510

Open versus endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: risk-stratified outcomes.

Gustavo S Oderich1, Thomas C Bower, Timothy M Sullivan, Haraldur Bjarnason, Stephen Cha, Peter Gloviczki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Outcomes of open (OR) and endovascular revascularization (ER) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) were analyzed with respect to clinical risk stratification.
METHODS: The data of 229 consecutive patients treated for CMI with OR (146 patients/265 vessels) or ER (83 patients/105 vessels) between 1991 and 2005 were reviewed. Patients were classified as low-risk or high-risk using standard scoring systems. End points were mortality and morbidity, recurrence-free survival, and patency rates. A subset analysis compared 111 patients (208 vessels) who had OR with 58 patients (76 vessels) who had stenting.
RESULTS: The ER patients were significantly older (71 +/- 15 vs 65 +/- 11 years; P < .05), had higher risk (58% vs 31%), and fewer vessels revascularized (1.3 +/- 0.5 vs 1.8 +/- 0.4). Four (2.7%) procedurally related deaths occurred in the OR and two (2.4%) in the ER group (P = NS). Mortality was higher for high-risk patients (OR, 6.7% vs 0.9%; ER, 4.8% vs 0%; P < .05), but differences were not significant among low-risk or high-risk OR vs ER patients. OR patients had more complications (36% vs 18%; P < .001) and longer hospitalization (12 +/- 8 vs 3 +/- 5 days; P < .001). At 5 years, OR had improved (P < .05) recurrence-free survival (89% +/- 4% vs 51% +/- 9%), and primary (88% +/- 3% vs 41% +/- 9%) and secondary patency rates (97% +/- 2% vs 88% +/- 4%). More restenoses (hazard ratio [HR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-10.2), recurrences (HR, 6.7; 95% CI, 3.3-13.8), and reinterventions occurred in the ER group (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.9-9.7). At last follow-up, significant symptom improvement was noted in 137 OR (96%) and 72 ER patients (92%, P = NS). In the subset analysis of patients having first-time operations vs stenting, OR resulted in improved (P < .05) recurrence-free survival (91% +/- 3% vs 56% +/- 8% at 5 years) and better primary and secondary patency rates (93% +/- 2% and 98% +/- 1% vs 52% +/- 8% and 93% +/- 4% at 3 years).
CONCLUSION: OR has similar mortality but higher morbidity and longer hospitalization than ER in low-risk or high-risk patients with CMI. Both treatments effectively improved symptoms, but restenosis, recurrent symptoms, and reinterventions were more likely in ER patients. These findings may guide treatment selection and counseling of low-risk and high-risk CMI patients undergoing OR or ER procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497510     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  26 in total

1.  Current concepts in the management of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Authors:  Gustavo S Oderich
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-04

2.  Exercise-induced abdominal pain: an unusual presentation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia.

Authors:  Vias Demetriou; W Chuen Liong; D Warakaulle; Shaun Appleton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: 28-year experience of endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Ulku Cenk Turba; Wael E Saad; Bulent Arslan; Saher S Sabri; Stacey Trotter; John F Angle; Klaus D Hagspiel; John A Kern; Kenneth J Cherry; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Mesenteric ischemia: Pathogenesis and challenging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Aikaterini Mastoraki; Sotiria Mastoraki; Evgenia Tziava; Stavroula Touloumi; Nikolaos Krinos; Nikolaos Danias; Andreas Lazaris; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 5.  [Management of complications after reconstruction of mesenteric arteries].

Authors:  Jürgen Zanow; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Has open vascular surgery disappeared?

Authors:  W Kirt Nichols; Wei Wei
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 May-Jun

Review 7.  [Endovascular therapy of chronic mesenteric ischemia].

Authors:  T Kölbel; S Wipper; H Diener; E S Debus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Chronic mesenteric ischemia: time to remember open revascularization.

Authors:  Michael Keese; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Thomas Schmandra
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Non-coronary Interventions: An Introduction to Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

Authors:  Brock Cookman; Suhail Allaqaband; Tonga Nfor
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-10

10.  Patient survival after open and endovascular mesenteric revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Authors:  Tiziano Tallarita; Gustavo S Oderich; Peter Gloviczki; Audra A Duncan; Manju Kalra; Stephen Cha; Sanjay Misra; Thomas C Bower
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.