Literature DB >> 19494684

Traditional operative treatment options.

D N J Ricketts, N B Pitts.   

Abstract

Operative intervention should be avoided, whenever possible, by adopting a preventive approach. Timely management of early caries can lead to arrest and possibly remineralization of the lesion rendering operative intervention unnecessary. The dentist must judge when the tooth tissue has become sufficiently demineralized to allow bacterial ingress leading to irreversible changes in the tissue. Once a decision has been made to restore a tooth, the clinician must decide, from a series of traditional operative treatment options, what materials should be used in the restoration and what preparation will achieve good retention and best preservation of tooth structure. With the development of new adhesive materials and a more conservative approach, a new era of minimally invasive dentistry has dawned. Improvements in the properties of composite materials have made them the choice for coronal aesthetic restorations: for posterior restorations involving load-bearing occlusal surfaces, amalgam is still the most commonly used material in UK dental practice; glass ionomer materials also have a place in minimally invasive dentistry--patterns of use differing in different counties. The numbers of studies investigating minimal caries removal are relatively limited; there are still scope and need for research in this field. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19494684     DOI: 10.1159/000224221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Monogr Oral Sci        ISSN: 0077-0892


  7 in total

1.  Effect of different root caries treatments on the sealing ability of conventional glass ionomer cement restorations.

Authors:  Vinicius R Geraldo-Martins; Cesar P Lepri; Regina G Palma-Dibb
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Behavior of Pediatric Dental Postgraduate Students on Non-restorative Cavity Control Technique: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Kesavaraj Balasubramani; Sharath Asokan; Pollachi Ramakrishnan Geetha Priya
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

3.  Caries management strategies for primary molars: 1-yr randomized control trial results.

Authors:  R M Santamaria; N P T Innes; V Machiulskiene; D J P Evans; C H Splieth
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Treatment decisions on Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) by Norwegian dentists - a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Simen E Kopperud; Cecilie Gravdahl Pedersen; Ivar Espelid
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  The correct use of the ART approach.

Authors:  Jo E Frencken; Soraya Coelho Leal
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting.

Authors:  Mariana Pinheiro Araujo; Nicola Patricia Innes; Clarissa Calil Bonifácio; Daniela Hesse; Isabel Cristina Olegário; Fausto Medeiros Mendes; Daniela Prócida Raggio
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniela Hesse; Mariana Pinheiro de Araujo; Isabel Cristina Olegário; Nicola Innes; Daniela Prócida Raggio; Clarissa Calil Bonifácio
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.