PURPOSE: To investigate the age-related differences in the inhomogeneous, anisotropic, nonlinear biomechanical properties of posterior sclera from old (22.9 +/- 5.3 years) and young (1.5 +/- 0.7 years) rhesus monkeys. METHODS: The posterior scleral shell of each eye was mounted on a custom-built pressurization apparatus, then intraocular pressure (IOP) was elevated from 5 to 45 mm Hg while the 3D displacements of the scleral surface were measured with speckle interferometry. Each scleral shell's geometry was digitally reconstructed from data generated by a 3-D digitizer (topography) and 20-MHz ultrasound (thickness). An inverse finite element (FE) method incorporating a fiber-reinforced constitutive model was used to extract a unique set of biomechanical properties for each eye. Displacements, thickness, stress, strain, tangent modulus, structural stiffness, and preferred collagen fiber orientation were mapped for each posterior sclera. RESULTS: The model yielded 3-D deformations of posterior sclera that matched well with those observed experimentally. The posterior sclera exhibited inhomogeneous, anisotropic, nonlinear mechanical behavior. The sclera was significantly thinner (P = 0.038) and tangent modulus and structural stiffness were significantly higher in old monkeys (P < 0.0001). On average, scleral collagen fibers were circumferentially oriented around the optic nerve head (ONH). No difference was found in the preferred collagen fiber orientation and fiber concentration factor between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior sclera of old monkeys is significantly stiffer than that of young monkeys and is therefore subject to higher stresses but lower strains at all levels of IOP. Age-related stiffening of the sclera may significantly influence ONH biomechanics and potentially contribute to age-related susceptibility to glaucomatous vision loss.
PURPOSE: To investigate the age-related differences in the inhomogeneous, anisotropic, nonlinear biomechanical properties of posterior sclera from old (22.9 +/- 5.3 years) and young (1.5 +/- 0.7 years) rhesus monkeys. METHODS: The posterior scleral shell of each eye was mounted on a custom-built pressurization apparatus, then intraocular pressure (IOP) was elevated from 5 to 45 mm Hg while the 3D displacements of the scleral surface were measured with speckle interferometry. Each scleral shell's geometry was digitally reconstructed from data generated by a 3-D digitizer (topography) and 20-MHz ultrasound (thickness). An inverse finite element (FE) method incorporating a fiber-reinforced constitutive model was used to extract a unique set of biomechanical properties for each eye. Displacements, thickness, stress, strain, tangent modulus, structural stiffness, and preferred collagen fiber orientation were mapped for each posterior sclera. RESULTS: The model yielded 3-D deformations of posterior sclera that matched well with those observed experimentally. The posterior sclera exhibited inhomogeneous, anisotropic, nonlinear mechanical behavior. The sclera was significantly thinner (P = 0.038) and tangent modulus and structural stiffness were significantly higher in old monkeys (P < 0.0001). On average, scleral collagen fibers were circumferentially oriented around the optic nerve head (ONH). No difference was found in the preferred collagen fiber orientation and fiber concentration factor between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior sclera of old monkeys is significantly stiffer than that of young monkeys and is therefore subject to higher stresses but lower strains at all levels of IOP. Age-related stiffening of the sclera may significantly influence ONH biomechanics and potentially contribute to age-related susceptibility to glaucomatous vision loss.
Authors: Anthony J Bellezza; Christopher J Rintalan; Hilary W Thompson; J Crawford Downs; Richard T Hart; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michaël J A Girard; J-K Francis Suh; Michael Bottlang; Claude F Burgoyne; J Crawford Downs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ian A Sigal; Richard A Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman; Jonathan L Grimm Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ian A Sigal; Hongli Yang; Michael D Roberts; Jonathan L Grimm; Claude F Burgoyne; Shaban Demirel; J Crawford Downs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Hongli Yang; Hilary Thompson; Michael D Roberts; Ian A Sigal; J Crawford Downs; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Michael D Roberts; Ian A Sigal; Yi Liang; Claude F Burgoyne; J Crawford Downs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ian A Sigal; Hongli Yang; Michael D Roberts; Claude F Burgoyne; J Crawford Downs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Keyton Clayson; Xueliang Pan; Elias Pavlatos; Ryan Short; Hugh Morris; Richard T Hart; Jun Liu Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Benjamin Cruz Perez; Junhua Tang; Hugh J Morris; Joel R Palko; Xueliang Pan; Richard T Hart; Jun Liu Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Mary E Pease; Ericka N Oglesby; Elizabeth Cone-Kimball; Joan L Jefferys; Matthew R Steinhart; Anthony J Kim; Justin Hanes; Harry A Quigley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 4.799