Literature DB >> 19494150

Lateral intraparietal cortex and reinforcement learning during a mixed-strategy game.

Hyojung Seo1, Dominic J Barraclough, Daeyeol Lee.   

Abstract

Activity of the neurons in the lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) displays a mixture of sensory, motor, and memory signals. Moreover, they often encode signals reflecting the accumulation of sensory evidence that certain eye movements might lead to a desirable outcome. However, when the environment changes dynamically, animals are also required to combine the information about its previously chosen actions and their outcomes appropriately to update continually the desirabilities of alternative actions. Here, we investigated whether LIP neurons encoded signals necessary to update an animal's decision-making strategies adaptively during a computer-simulated matching-pennies game. Using a reinforcement learning algorithm, we estimated the value functions that best predicted the animal's choices on a trial-by-trial basis. We found that, immediately before the animal revealed its choice, approximately 18% of LIP neurons changed their activity according to the difference in the value functions for the two targets. In addition, a somewhat higher fraction of LIP neurons displayed signals related to the sum of the value functions, which might correspond to the state value function or an average rate of reward used as a reference point. Similar to the neurons in the prefrontal cortex, many LIP neurons also encoded the signals related to the animal's previous choices. Thus, the posterior parietal cortex might be a part of the network that provides the substrate for forming appropriate associations between actions and outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19494150      PMCID: PMC2743508          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1479-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

Review 1.  Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Reward encoding in the monkey anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C Amiez; J P Joseph; E Procyk
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Samejima; Yasumasa Ueda; Kenji Doya; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Imaging valuation models in human choice.

Authors:  P Read Montague; Brooks King-Casas; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; John A Assad
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The computational neurobiology of learning and reward.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Daw; Kenji Doya
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamics.

Authors:  Greg S Corrado; Leo P Sugrue; H Sebastian Seung; William T Newsome
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Neural basis of quasi-rational decision making.

Authors:  Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning.

Authors:  Joseph J Paton; Marina A Belova; Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction.

Authors:  Brian Knutson; Jeffrey C Cooper
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.710

View more
  69 in total

1.  The prefrontal cortex and hybrid learning during iterative competitive games.

Authors:  Hiroshi Abe; Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Dissociating activity in the lateral intraparietal area from value using a visual foraging task.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  LIP activity in the interstimulus interval of a change detection task biases the behavioral response.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; Daniel J Foster; Caroline J Charpentier; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reward Size Informs Repeat-Switch Decisions and Strongly Modulates the Activity of Neurons in Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The interaction of perceived control and Gambler's fallacy in risky decision making: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Robin Shao; Delin Sun; Tatia M C Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neuronal responses to target onset in oculomotor and somatomotor parietal circuits differ markedly in a choice task.

Authors:  J Kubanek; C Wang; L H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Frontal-parietal and limbic-striatal activity underlies information sampling in the best choice problem.

Authors:  Vincent D Costa; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Distinct roles of rodent orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex in decision making.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Sul; Hoseok Kim; Namjung Huh; Daeyeol Lee; Min Whan Jung
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Neuroscience: Persistent feedback.

Authors:  Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.