Emad Rakha1, Jorge S Reis-Filho. 1. Department of Histopathology, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Advances in the understanding of the molecular and genetic mechanisms of breast cancer have led to realization of the heterogeneity of the disease and the promise of a new era of individualized management for patients with breast cancer. The advent and use of high-throughput molecular methods for the study of breast cancer have brought to the forefront the existence of the so-called basal-like breast cancers, which have been shown to have distinct biologic and clinical characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To critically assess the clinicopathologic features of basal-like breast cancer, discuss the morphologic and immunophenotypic features of basal-like cancer, and explore the criteria that can be used to identify these tumors in routine practice. DATA SOURCES: A Medline/PubMed search was conducted using the terms "basal-like," "(basal OR basaloid OR basal-like) AND breast cancer." All articles in English language were retrieved and critically reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Basal-like breast cancers constitute a distinct, yet heterogeneous, class of neoplasms associated with specific histologic features and poor prognosis despite high response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Basal-like breast cancers have features that recapitulate those of tumors arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers, and the majority of patients with BRCA1 germline mutations develop basal-like breast cancers. At the molecular level, basal-like cancers harbor a transcriptome that is distinct from that of hormone-receptor-positive or HER2-amplified tumors, being characterized by the expression of genes usually found in basal/myoepithelial cells of the breast. However, translating the new concepts about basal-like cancer into clinical practice has proven a Herculean task, given the lack of an internationally accepted definition for these tumors and for the method of identification in routine practice.
CONTEXT: Advances in the understanding of the molecular and genetic mechanisms of breast cancer have led to realization of the heterogeneity of the disease and the promise of a new era of individualized management for patients with breast cancer. The advent and use of high-throughput molecular methods for the study of breast cancer have brought to the forefront the existence of the so-called basal-like breast cancers, which have been shown to have distinct biologic and clinical characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To critically assess the clinicopathologic features of basal-like breast cancer, discuss the morphologic and immunophenotypic features of basal-like cancer, and explore the criteria that can be used to identify these tumors in routine practice. DATA SOURCES: A Medline/PubMed search was conducted using the terms "basal-like," "(basal OR basaloid OR basal-like) AND breast cancer." All articles in English language were retrieved and critically reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Basal-like breast cancers constitute a distinct, yet heterogeneous, class of neoplasms associated with specific histologic features and poor prognosis despite high response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Basal-like breast cancers have features that recapitulate those of tumors arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers, and the majority of patients with BRCA1 germline mutations develop basal-like breast cancers. At the molecular level, basal-like cancers harbor a transcriptome that is distinct from that of hormone-receptor-positive or HER2-amplified tumors, being characterized by the expression of genes usually found in basal/myoepithelial cells of the breast. However, translating the new concepts about basal-like cancer into clinical practice has proven a Herculean task, given the lack of an internationally accepted definition for these tumors and for the method of identification in routine practice.
Authors: Saevar Ingthorsson; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Valgardur Sigurdsson; Agla J R Friðriksdottir; Sigridur K Bodvarsdottir; Margret Steinarsdottir; Oskar Johannsson; Magnus K Magnusson; Helga M Ogmundsdottir; Thorarinn Gudjonsson Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: Mandana Veiseh; Daniel H Kwon; Alexander D Borowsky; Cornelia Tolg; Hon S Leong; John D Lewis; Eva A Turley; Mina J Bissell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 11.205