Literature DB >> 19488846

Brief report: a comparison of indirect versus experimental strategies for the assessment of pica.

Lauren C Wasano1, John C Borrero, Carolynn S Kohn.   

Abstract

We conducted functional analyses of pica for three individuals with varying levels of intellectual disabilities. In addition, two indirect assessment instruments (the Motivational Assessment Scale [MAS], and the Questions About Behavioral Function [QABF]) were also administered to both the parent and teacher of the child participants. Results of the functional analyses indicated that pica was sensitive to automatic reinforcement. Further, results of both the MAS and QABF also suggested behavioral sensitivity to automatic reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19488846     DOI： 10.1007/s10803-009-0766-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord        ISSN： 0162-3257


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale.

Authors:  T R Paclawskyj; J L Matson; K S Rush; Y Smalls; T R Vollmer
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Brandon E McCord
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors.

Authors:  Scott S Hall
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

4.  A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

5.  Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: a failure to replicate.

Authors:  J R Zarcone; T A Rodgers; B A Iwata; D A Rourke; M F Dorsey
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1991

6.  Descriptive and experimental analyses of potential precursors to problem behavior.

Authors:  Carrie S W Borrero; John C Borrero
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

7.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  A validity study on the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) Scale: predicting treatment success for self-injury, aggression, and stereotypies.

Authors:  J L Matson; J W Bamburg; K E Cherry; T R Paclawskyj
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

9.  Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; L A LeBlanc; A S Worsdell; S E Lindauer; K M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

10.  Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for edibles.

Authors:  Lee Kern; Kristin Starosta; Barry Eshkol Adelman
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2006-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Caregivers' agreement and validity of indirect functional analysis: a cross cultural evaluation across multiple problem behavior topographies.

Authors:  Javier Virues-Ortega; David Segui-Duran; Alberto Descalzo-Quero; Jose Julio Carnerero; Neil Martin
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-01

2.  Challenging behavior in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: initial test of biobehavioral influences.

Authors:  Kurt A Freeman; Rose Eagle; Louise S Merkens; Darryn Sikora; Kersti Pettit-Kekel; Mina Nguyen-Driver; Robert D Steiner
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Iser G DeLeon; Carrie S W Borrero; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  Behav Interv       Date:  2015-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.