Literature DB >> 19488824

Proximal femur allograft-prosthesis with compression plates and a short stem.

D Luis Muscolo1, German L Farfalli, Luis A Aponte-Tinao, Miguel A Ayerza.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Proximal femur allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs) performed with compression plates and a short stem theoretically could minimize the resorption or nonunion that reportedly occurs with long stems bypassing the diaphyseal osteotomy. To confirm this theoretical consideration, we retrospectively reviewed 34 patients with 38 proximal femoral APCs using a short-cemented femoral stem and compression plates for diaphyseal osteotomy fixation. In 26 patients, the plate fixation extended over at least half the femoral stem and in 12, it did not. We reinserted the abductor mechanism with two techniques: in 10 cases the host trochanter was reattached to the APC, and in 28 the host tendons were sutured to the tendinous insertion of the allograft. The overall survival of the entire series was 72% at 5 years and 69% at 10 years. Eleven of the 38 (29%) APCs were removed: three for infection, one for local recurrence of tumor, and seven for fractures. Trendelenburg gait occurred in four of 21 patients with direct tendon-to-tendon suture of the abductor mechanism and in three of six patients with trochanteric osteotomy. The overall APC survival rate was greater in patients in whom the allograft was adequately protected with internal fixation than in patients in whom it was not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19488824      PMCID: PMC2795834          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0903-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors.

Authors:  F Langlais; J C Lambotte; P Collin; H Thomazeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; E S Mortimer; A H Glassman; C A Engh; J E Miller; C E Brooks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur and acetabulum. A survival analysis.

Authors:  H S Dobbs; J T Scales; J N Wilson; H B Kemp; H J Burrows; R S Sneath
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981-08

4.  Proximal femur reconstruction by an allograft prosthesis composite.

Authors:  Davide Donati; Stefano Giacomini; Enrico Gozzi; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Retrieved human allografts : a clinicopathological study.

Authors:  W F Enneking; D A Campanacci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Allograft prosthetic composite arthroplasty for osteosarcoma and other aggressive bone tumors.

Authors:  S Gitelis; P Piasecki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. How long do the reconstructions last?

Authors:  S M Horowitz; D B Glasser; J M Lane; J H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Reconstruction for defects of the proximal part of the femur using allograft arthroplasty.

Authors:  M H Jofe; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford; H J Mankin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  W F Enneking; W Dunham; M C Gebhardt; M Malawar; D J Pritchard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Reconstructions after resections of tumors involving the proximal femur.

Authors:  M E Johnson; H J Mankin
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Reconstruction of the proximal femur with the MUTARS® system].

Authors:  W Winkelmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Does Local Zoledronate Applied to Pasteurized Bone Autografts Improve the Likelihood of Union of Graft-Host Junctions after Limb-sparing Surgery?

Authors:  Piya Kiatisevi; Bhasanan Sukanthanak; Pongsiri Piakong; Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Survival and outcomes of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for primary and non-primary bone tumors: Single institutional results.

Authors:  Charles A Gusho; Bishir Clayton; Nabil Mehta; Matthew W Colman; Steven Gitelis; Alan T Blank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07

4.  Proximal femoral allograft for major segmental femoral bone loss: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  B A Rogers; A Sternheim; D Backstein; O Safir; A E Gross
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-13

5.  Pedicle frozen autograft-prosthesis composite reconstructions for malignant bone tumors of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Shinji Miwa; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Akihiko Takeuchi; Kentaro Igarashi; Takashi Higuchi; Yuta Taniguchi; Yoshihiro Araki; Hirotaka Yonezawa; Sei Morinaga; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Long-term results of uncemented allograft prosthesis composite reconstruction for the tumor in proximal femur: a minimum follow-up of sixty-five months.

Authors:  Cai Liu; Li Min; Yong Zhou; Yi Luo; Fan Tang; Minxun Lu; Hong Duan; Wenli Zhang; Xinzhu Yu; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.