Literature DB >> 19487946

The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a multicenter analysis.

Michael L Cheatham1, Jan J De Waele, Inneke De Laet, Bart De Keulenaer, Sandy Widder, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Adrian B Cresswell, Manu Malbrain, Zsolt Bodnar, Jorge H Mejia-Mantilla, Richard Reis, Michael Parr, Robert Schulze, Sonia Puig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among the critically ill. IAP is most commonly measured using the intravesicular or "bladder" technique. The impact of changes in body position on the accuracy of IAP measurements, such as head of bed elevation to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, remains unclear.
DESIGN: Prospective, cohort study.
SETTING: Twelve international intensive care units. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-two critically ill medical and surgical patients at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.
INTERVENTIONS: Triplicate intravesicular pressure measurements were performed at least 4 hours apart with the patient in the supine, 15 degrees , and 30 degrees head of bed elevated positions. The zero reference point was the mid-axillary line at the iliac crest.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean IAP values at each head of bed position were significantly different (p < 0.0001). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP15 degrees was 1.5 mm Hg (1.3-1.7). The bias between IAPsupine and IAP30 degrees was 3.7 mm Hg (3.4-4.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Head of bed elevation results in clinically significant increases in measured IAP. Consistent body positioning from one IAP measurement to the next is necessary to allow consistent trending of IAP for accurate clinical decision making. Studies that involve IAP measurements should describe the patient's body position so that these values may be properly interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487946     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a021fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  22 in total

1.  Noninvasive monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure by measuring abdominal wall tension.

Authors:  Yuan-Zhuo Chen; Shu-Ying Yan; Yan-Qing Chen; Yu-Gang Zhuang; Zhao Wei; Shu-Qin Zhou; Hu Peng
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  The effect of body position on compartmental intra-abdominal pressure following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Adrian B Cresswell; Wayel Jassem; Parthi Srinivasan; Andreas A Prachalias; Elizabeth Sizer; William Burnal; Georg Auzinger; Paolo Muiesan; Mohammed Rela; Nigel D Heaton; Matthew J Bowles; Julia A Wendon
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 3.  Management of peripartum intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  M James Lozada; Varun Goyal; Danielle Levin; Rachel L Walden; Sarah S Osmundson; Luis D Pacheco; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Esophageal pressures in acute lung injury: do they represent artifact or useful information about transpulmonary pressure, chest wall mechanics, and lung stress?

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Carl R O'Donnell; Negin Behazin; Atul Malhotra; Todd Sarge; Ray Ritz; Victor Novack; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-17

5.  Increasing abdominal pressure with and without PEEP: effects on intra-peritoneal, intra-organ and intra-vascular pressures.

Authors:  Stephan M Jakob; Rafael Knuesel; Jyrki J Tenhunen; Richard Pradl; Jukka Takala
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Influence of body position, PEEP and intra-abdominal pressure on the catheter positioning for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist.

Authors:  Jürgen Barwing; Cristina Pedroni; Michael Quintel; Onnen Moerer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure in cirrhotic patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Hani M Tamim; Asgar H Rishu; Abdulrahman Aljumah; Yaseen M Arabi
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nirooshan Rooban; Adrian Regli; Wendy A Davis; Bart L De Keulenaer
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Derek J Roberts; Jan De Waele; Roman Jaeschke; Manu L N G Malbrain; Bart De Keulenaer; Juan Duchesne; Martin Bjorck; Ari Leppaniemi; Janeth C Ejike; Michael Sugrue; Michael Cheatham; Rao Ivatury; Chad G Ball; Annika Reintam Blaser; Adrian Regli; Zsolt J Balogh; Scott D'Amours; Dieter Debergh; Mark Kaplan; Edward Kimball; Claudia Olvera
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Effect of mechanical ventilation on intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients without other risk factors for abdominal hypertension: an observational multicenter epidemiological study.

Authors:  Caridad de Dios Soler Morejón; Teddy Osmin Tamargo Barbeito
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.