Literature DB >> 19487607

Peace of mind and sense of purpose as core existential issues among parents of children with cancer.

Jennifer W Mack1, Joanne Wolfe, E Francis Cook, Holcombe E Grier, Paul D Cleary, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate issues experienced by parents of children with cancer and factors related to parents' ability to find peace of mind.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-four parents of children with cancer (response rate, 70%) in the first year of cancer treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being sense of meaning subscale.
RESULTS: Principal components analysis of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being sense of meaning subscale responses identified 2 distinct constructs, peace of mind (Cronbach alpha = .83) and sense of purpose (Cronbach alpha = .71). Scores ranged from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the strongest sense of peace or purpose. One hundred forty-seven of 181 parents (81%) scored 4 or higher for questions related to sense of purpose (mean [SD] score, 4.4 [0.6]). Only 44 of 185 parents (24%) had scores in the same range for peace of mind (mean [SD] score, 3.2 [0.9]) (P < .001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, parents had higher peace of mind scores when they also reported that they trusted the oncologist's judgment (odds ratio [OR] = 6.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-30.02), that the oncologist had disclosed detailed prognostic information (OR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.14-3.70), and that the oncologist had provided high-quality information about the cancer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.11-5.79). Peace of mind was not associated with prognosis (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.32) or time since diagnosis (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.995-1.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may be able to facilitate formulation of peace of mind by giving parents high-quality medical information, including prognostic information, and facilitating parents' trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487607     DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  27 in total

1.  Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Giselle K Perez; John M Salsman; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Elyse R Park; Abby R Rosenberg
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-03

2.  Core Functions of Communication in Pediatric Medicine: an Exploratory Analysis of Parent and Patient Narratives.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Annie B Friedrich; Jessica Mozersky; Heidi Walsh; James DuBois
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Processing Information After a Child's Cancer Diagnosis-How Parents Learn.

Authors:  Cheryl C Rodgers; Kristin Stegenga; Janice S Withycombe; Karen Sachse; Katherine Patterson Kelly
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Early information needs of adolescents and young adults about late effects of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Katie A Greenzang; Karen M Fasciano; Susan D Block; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Faith and protection: the construction of hope by parents of children with leukemia and their oncologists.

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Jonathan Hill; Joanne Ward; Katja Gravenhorst; Tim Eden; Bridget Young
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-02-27

6.  Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process.

Authors:  Sarah R Brand McCarthy; Tammy I Kang; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The evolution of regret: decision-making for parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Tammy I Kang; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosure in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Angel M Cronin; Tammy I Kang; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Longitudinal prognostic communication needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Karen Fasciano; Susan D Block; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.