Andrew D Racine1, Elizabeth M Alderman, Jeffrey R Avner. 1. Division of General Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, 1621 Eastchester Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. aracine@montefiore.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test whether follow-up phone calls to counsel families about pediatric emergency department (PED) use and primary care availability made after an index PED visit would modify subsequent PED use. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective randomized intervention. SETTING: An urban academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 4246 individuals aged 0 to 21 years from each of 4 participating primary care practices recording an index PED visit from April through December 2005. INTERVENTION: Follow-up phone call from the primary care practice within 72 hours of the initial PED visit to counsel about the availability of after-hours advice and when to access the PED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All subsequent visits to primary care practices, PED, pediatric subspecialists, or for inpatient hospitalization during a 365-day follow-up period. Logistic and ordinary least squares regressions estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of follow-up visits, controlling for covariates. RESULTS: Of the 2166 intervention subjects, 816 (37.7%) recorded follow-up PED visits compared with 819 (39.4%) of the 2080 control subjects (P = .26, not significant). The adjusted odds of a follow-up visit being to the PED rather than to another venue was significantly less for intervention than for control subjects (odds ratio, 0.88; confidence interval, 0.82-0.94), indicating decreased intensity of PED use. CONCLUSION: Follow-up phone calls from primary care practices after PED visits counseling patients on the use of primary care and emergency services can modulate subsequent care-seeking behavior and decrease future PED use.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test whether follow-up phone calls to counsel families about pediatric emergency department (PED) use and primary care availability made after an index PED visit would modify subsequent PED use. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective randomized intervention. SETTING: An urban academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 4246 individuals aged 0 to 21 years from each of 4 participating primary care practices recording an index PED visit from April through December 2005. INTERVENTION: Follow-up phone call from the primary care practice within 72 hours of the initial PED visit to counsel about the availability of after-hours advice and when to access the PED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All subsequent visits to primary care practices, PED, pediatric subspecialists, or for inpatient hospitalization during a 365-day follow-up period. Logistic and ordinary least squares regressions estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of follow-up visits, controlling for covariates. RESULTS: Of the 2166 intervention subjects, 816 (37.7%) recorded follow-up PED visits compared with 819 (39.4%) of the 2080 control subjects (P = .26, not significant). The adjusted odds of a follow-up visit being to the PED rather than to another venue was significantly less for intervention than for control subjects (odds ratio, 0.88; confidence interval, 0.82-0.94), indicating decreased intensity of PED use. CONCLUSION: Follow-up phone calls from primary care practices after PED visits counseling patients on the use of primary care and emergency services can modulate subsequent care-seeking behavior and decrease future PED use.
Authors: Pankaj B Patel; David R Vinson; Marla N Gardner; David A Wulf; Patricia Kipnis; Vincent Liu; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Chén C Kenyon; Siobhan M Gruschow; Wren L Haaland; Arti D Desai; Sarah A Adams; Talia A Hitt; Derek J Williams; David P Johnson; Rita Mangione-Smith Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Melanie A Ruffner; Sarah E Henrickson; Marianne Chilutti; Robert Grundmeier; Jonathan M Spergel; Terri F Brown-Whitehorn Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: N Benahmed; S Laokri; W H Zhang; N Verhaeghe; J Trybou; L Cohen; A De Wever; S Alexander Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2012-10-14 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Merel van Loon-van Gaalen; M Christien van der Linden; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Roos C van der Mast Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 7.538