Margaret Samuels-Kalow1,2, Karin Rhodes3, Julie Uspal4, Alyssa Reyes Smith5, Emily Hardy1, Cynthia Mollen1,2. 1. The Division of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2. The Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Emergency Medicine Residency, Philadelphia, PA. 5. The Boston Combined Residency Program for Pediatrics, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) discharge requires conveying critical information in a time-limited and distracting setting. Limited health literacy may put patients at risk of incomplete comprehension, but the relationship between discharge communication needs and health literacy has not been well defined. The goal of this study was to characterize the variation in needs and preferences regarding the ED discharge process by health literacy and identify novel ideas for process improvement from parents and patients. METHODS: This was an in-depth qualitative interview study in two EDs using asthma as a model system for health communication. Adult patients and parents of pediatric patients with an asthma exacerbation and planned discharge were enrolled using purposive sampling to balance across literacy groups at each site. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, coded independently by two team members, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached in both literacy groups at each site. RESULTS: In-depth interviews were completed with 51 participants: 20 adult patients and 31 pediatric parents. The majority of participants identified barriers related to ED providers, such as use of medical terminology, and systems of care, such as absence of protected time for discharge communication. Patients with limited health literacy, but not those with adequate literacy, identified conflicting information between health care sources as a barrier to successful ED discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Participants across literacy groups and settings identified multiple actionable areas for improvement in the ED discharge process. These included the use of simplified/lay language, increased visual learning and demonstration, and the desire for complete information. Individuals with limited literacy may particularly benefit from increased attention to consistency.
OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) discharge requires conveying critical information in a time-limited and distracting setting. Limited health literacy may put patients at risk of incomplete comprehension, but the relationship between discharge communication needs and health literacy has not been well defined. The goal of this study was to characterize the variation in needs and preferences regarding the ED discharge process by health literacy and identify novel ideas for process improvement from parents and patients. METHODS: This was an in-depth qualitative interview study in two EDs using asthma as a model system for health communication. Adult patients and parents of pediatric patients with an asthma exacerbation and planned discharge were enrolled using purposive sampling to balance across literacy groups at each site. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, coded independently by two team members, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached in both literacy groups at each site. RESULTS: In-depth interviews were completed with 51 participants: 20 adult patients and 31 pediatric parents. The majority of participants identified barriers related to ED providers, such as use of medical terminology, and systems of care, such as absence of protected time for discharge communication. Patients with limited health literacy, but not those with adequate literacy, identified conflicting information between health care sources as a barrier to successful ED discharge. CONCLUSIONS:Participants across literacy groups and settings identified multiple actionable areas for improvement in the ED discharge process. These included the use of simplified/lay language, increased visual learning and demonstration, and the desire for complete information. Individuals with limited literacy may particularly benefit from increased attention to consistency.
Authors: Sharon R Smith; David M Jaffe; Edwin B Fisher; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Gabrielle Highstein; Robert C Strunk Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Janet A Curran; Allyson J Gallant; Roger Zemek; Amanda S Newton; Mona Jabbour; Jill Chorney; Andrea Murphy; Lisa Hartling; Kate MacWilliams; Amy Plint; Shannon MacPhee; Andrea Bishop; Samuel G Campbell Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-03
Authors: Margot Jager; Janine de Zeeuw; Janne Tullius; Roberta Papa; Cinzia Giammarchi; Amanda Whittal; Andrea F de Winter Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michael T Dalley; Mauricio J Baca; Chandelle Raza; Laurie Boge; David Edwards; Robert Goldszer; Luigi Cubeddu; David Farcy Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Nidhya Navanandan; Sarah K Schmidt; Natasha Cabrera; Irina Topoz; Michael C DiStefano; Rakesh D Mistry Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-09-25
Authors: Julie Kanter; Robert Gibson; Raymona H Lawrence; Matthew P Smeltzer; Norma L Pugh; Jeffrey Glassberg; Rita V Masese; Allison A King; Cecelia Calhoun; Jane S Hankins; Marsha Treadwell Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-05-01
Authors: Janet A Curran; Christine Cassidy; Andrea Bishop; Lori Wozney; Amy C Plint; Krista Ritchie; Sharon E Straus; Helen Wong; Amanda Newton; Mona Jabbour; Shannon MacPhee; Sydney Breneol; Emma Burns; Jill Chorney; Jennifer Lawton; Melanie Doyle; Rebecca MacKay; Roger Zemek; Tanya Penney; Jeremy Grimshaw Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.692