Literature DB >> 19485694

Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Simona Buetti1, Dirk Kerzel.   

Abstract

In the Simon effect, participants make a left or right keypress in response to a nonspatial attribute (e.g., color) that is presented on the left or right. Reaction times (RTs) increase when the response activated by the irrelevant stimulus location and the response retrieved by instruction are in conflict. The authors measured RTs and movement parameters (MPs) of pointing responses in a typical Simon task. Their results show that the trajectories veer toward the imperative stimulus. This bias decreased as RTs increased. The authors suggest that the time course of trajectory deviations reflects the resolution of the response conflict over time. Further, time pressure did not affect the size of the Simon effect in MPs or its time course, but strongly reduced the Simon effect in RTs. In contrast, response selection before the onset of a go signal on the left or right did not affect the Simon effect in RTs, but reduced the Simon effect in MPs and reversed the time course. The authors speculate about independent Simon effects associated with response selection and programming. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19485694     DOI: 10.1037/a0011092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Simon in action: the effect of spatial congruency on grasping trajectories.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Daniela Aisenberg; Yael Salzer; Avishai Henik; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-18

3.  Response mode modulates the congruency sequence effect in spatial conflict tasks: evidence from aimed-movement responses.

Authors:  Chae Eun Lim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-26

4.  The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

5.  Simon effects in action sequences.

Authors:  Claudia Braun; Armin Kibele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Layers of latent effects in cognitive control: An EEG investigation.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Sandra M Pacione; Heather F Neyedli; Matthew Ray; Jerry Ou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-10

8.  Preparation of forefinger's sequence on keyboard orients ocular fixations on computer screen.

Authors:  Alexandre Coutté; Gérard Olivier; Sylvane Faure; Thierry Baccino
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-03-30

9.  Revealing the effects of temporal orienting of attention on response conflict using continuous movements.

Authors:  Melisa Menceloglu; Satoru Suzuki; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Action plans produce separate Simon effects for picking up and transporting objects.

Authors:  James D Miles; Jessica K Witt; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.