Literature DB >> 19484585

Cost-effectiveness analysis of two vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems: Mammotome and Vacora.

C A Pistolese1, A M Ciarrapico, F Della Gatta, T Perretta, E Cossu, F Bolacchi, E Bonanno, G Simonetti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare the cost effectiveness of two vacuum-assisted breast biopsy devices, the Mammotome and Vacora systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and June 2006, 238 vacuum-assisted breast biopsies were performed at our radiology department. Five out of 238 lesions were excluded because of inadequate sampling. The Mammotome system was used in 108/233 lesions and the Vacora system in 125/233. Fifty-eight lesions underwent ultrasound-guided breast biopsy, and 50 lesions underwent mammography-guided biopsy with both Mammotome and Vacora devices. Magnetic-resonance-guided biopsy was possible with the Vacora system only (17/125 lesions).
RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed. No significant differences were found between the results of the Mammotome and Vacora biopsies in terms of effectiveness: sensitivity was 84.4% and 86.2%, respectively, and specificity 100%. In terms of cost, the Mammotome system has higher costs per procedure compared with the Vacora.
CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical results confirm the diagnostic accuracy of both the Mammotome and Vacora systems, whereas our cost analysis shows that there is a considerable difference, mostly related to the initial investment.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19484585     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0404-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  19 in total

1.  Core-needle and surgical breast biopsy: comparison of three methods of assessing cost.

Authors:  J H Burkhardt; J H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman; M P Sama
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  [MR-guided stereotactic breast biopsy: technical aspects and preliminary results].

Authors:  Pietro Panizza; Francesco De Cobelli; Angela De Gaspari; Simone Gusmini; Alessandro Zanello; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation.

Authors:  T Perretta; C A Pistolese; F Bolacchi; E Cossu; V Fiaschetti; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.

Authors:  Susan G Orel; Mark Rosen; Carolyn Mies; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; A Elevelt; C C Leutner; J Gieseke; E Pakos; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  [Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast. Its diagnostic imaging and the role of percutaneous needle biopsy with a 14-gauge needle].

Authors:  M Bazzocchi; I Facecchia; C Zuiani; C di Loreto; F Puglisi; A Vasciaveo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Total cost comparison of 2 biopsy methods for nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  B I Bodai; B Boyd; L Brown; H Wadley; V J Zannis; M Holzman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Cost minimization study of image-guided core biopsy versus surgical excisional biopsy for women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Robert M Golub; Charles L Bennett; Tammy Stinson; Luz Venta; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy of isolated breast microcalcifications identified by mammography. Experience with a vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy device.

Authors:  Daniela Ambrogetti; Simonetta Bianchi; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.469

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of two breast biopsy procedures: surgical biopsy versus vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  C A Pistolese; A Ciarrapico; T Perretta; E Cossu; F della Gatta; S Giura; C Caramanica; G Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: analysis of 602 biopsies performed over 5 years.

Authors:  A Luparia; M Durando; P Campanino; E Regini; D Lucarelli; A Talenti; G Mattone; G Mariscotti; A Sapino; G Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Satoko Nakano; Yoshimi Imawari; Akemi Mibu; Masahiko Otsuka; Toshinori Oinuma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging.

Authors:  G Carbognin; V Girardi; A Brandalise; I Baglio; A Bucci; F Bonetti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approach.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  3-5 BI-RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MRI and Histological Findings.

Authors:  Valeria Fiaschetti; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Tommaso Perretta; Elsa Cossu; Chiara Arganini; Claudia Salimbeni; Angela Lia Scarano; Silvia Arduini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-08-25

7.  Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Jialin Zhao; Xuejing Wang; Ying Xu; Li Peng; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.