OBJECTIVE: To identify, quantify, and compare total facility costs for 2 breast biopsy methods: vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) and needle-wire-localized open surgical biopsy (OSB). STUDY DESIGN: A time-and-motion study was done to identify unit resources used in both procedures. Costs were imputed from published literature to value resources. A comparison of the total (fixed and variable) costs of the 2 procedures was done. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A convenience sample of 2 high-volume breast biopsy (both VAB and OSB) facilities was identified. A third facility (OSB only) and 8 other sites (VAB only) were used to capture variation. Staff interviews, patient medical records, and billing data were used to check observed data. One hundred and sixty-seven uncomplicated procedures (71 OSBs, 96 VABs) were observed. Available demographic and clinical data were analyzed to assess selection bias, and sensitivity analyses were done on the main assumptions. RESULTS: The total facility costs of the VAB procedure were lower than the costs of the OSB procedure. The overall cost advantage for using VAB ranges from $314 to $843 per procedure depending on the facility type. Variable cost comparison indicated little difference between the 2 procedures. The largest fixed cost difference was $763. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities must consider the cost of new technology, especially when the new technology is as effective as the present technology. The seemingly high cost of equipment might negatively influence a decision to adopt VAB, but when total facility costs were analyzed, the new technology was less costly.
OBJECTIVE: To identify, quantify, and compare total facility costs for 2 breast biopsy methods: vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) and needle-wire-localized open surgical biopsy (OSB). STUDY DESIGN: A time-and-motion study was done to identify unit resources used in both procedures. Costs were imputed from published literature to value resources. A comparison of the total (fixed and variable) costs of the 2 procedures was done. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A convenience sample of 2 high-volume breast biopsy (both VAB and OSB) facilities was identified. A third facility (OSB only) and 8 other sites (VAB only) were used to capture variation. Staff interviews, patient medical records, and billing data were used to check observed data. One hundred and sixty-seven uncomplicated procedures (71 OSBs, 96 VABs) were observed. Available demographic and clinical data were analyzed to assess selection bias, and sensitivity analyses were done on the main assumptions. RESULTS: The total facility costs of the VAB procedure were lower than the costs of the OSB procedure. The overall cost advantage for using VAB ranges from $314 to $843 per procedure depending on the facility type. Variable cost comparison indicated little difference between the 2 procedures. The largest fixed cost difference was $763. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities must consider the cost of new technology, especially when the new technology is as effective as the present technology. The seemingly high cost of equipment might negatively influence a decision to adopt VAB, but when total facility costs were analyzed, the new technology was less costly.
Authors: C A Pistolese; A M Ciarrapico; F Della Gatta; T Perretta; E Cossu; F Bolacchi; E Bonanno; G Simonetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: A Luparia; M Durando; P Campanino; E Regini; D Lucarelli; A Talenti; G Mattone; G Mariscotti; A Sapino; G Gandini Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.469