Philipp Singer1, Joram Feldon, Benjamin K Yee. 1. Laboratory of Behavioural Neurobiology, Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Schorenstrasse 16, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Due to its intrinsic deficiency in prepulse inhibition (PPI), the inbred DBA/2 mouse strain has been considered as an animal model for evaluating antipsychotic drugs. However, the PPI impairment observed in DBA/2 mice relative to the common C57BL/6 strain is confounded by a concomitant reduction in baseline startle reactivity. In this study, we examined the robustness of the PPI deficit when this confound is fully taken into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice were compared in a PPI experiment using multiple pulse stimulus intensities, allowing the possible matching of startle reactivity prior to examination of PPI. The known PPI-enhancing effect of the antipsychotic, clozapine, was then evaluated in half of the animals, whilst the other half was subjected to two additional schizophrenia-relevant behavioural tests: latent inhibition (LI) and locomotor reaction to the psychostimulants-amphetamine and phencyclidine. RESULTS: PPI deficiency in DBA/2 relative to C57BL/6 mice was essentially independent of the strain difference in baseline startle reactivity. Yet, there was no evidence that DBA/2 mice were superior in detecting the PPI-facilitating effect of clozapine when startle difference was balanced. Compared with C57BL/6 mice, DBA/2 mice also showed impaired LI and a different temporal profile in their responses to amphetamine and phencyclidine. CONCLUSION: Relative to the C57BL/6 strain, DBA/2 mice displayed multiple behavioural traits relevant to schizophrenia psycho- and physiopathology, indicative of both dopaminergic and glutamatergic/N-methyl-D: -aspartic acid receptor dysfunctions. Further examination of their underlying neurobiological differences is therefore warranted in order to enhance the power of this specific inter-strain comparison as a model of schizophrenia.
RATIONALE: Due to its intrinsic deficiency in prepulse inhibition (PPI), the inbred DBA/2 mouse strain has been considered as an animal model for evaluating antipsychotic drugs. However, the PPI impairment observed in DBA/2 mice relative to the common C57BL/6 strain is confounded by a concomitant reduction in baseline startle reactivity. In this study, we examined the robustness of the PPI deficit when this confound is fully taken into account. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice were compared in a PPI experiment using multiple pulse stimulus intensities, allowing the possible matching of startle reactivity prior to examination of PPI. The known PPI-enhancing effect of the antipsychotic, clozapine, was then evaluated in half of the animals, whilst the other half was subjected to two additional schizophrenia-relevant behavioural tests: latent inhibition (LI) and locomotor reaction to the psychostimulants-amphetamine and phencyclidine. RESULTS: PPI deficiency in DBA/2 relative to C57BL/6 mice was essentially independent of the strain difference in baseline startle reactivity. Yet, there was no evidence that DBA/2 mice were superior in detecting the PPI-facilitating effect of clozapine when startle difference was balanced. Compared with C57BL/6 mice, DBA/2 mice also showed impaired LI and a different temporal profile in their responses to amphetamine and phencyclidine. CONCLUSION: Relative to the C57BL/6 strain, DBA/2 mice displayed multiple behavioural traits relevant to schizophrenia psycho- and physiopathology, indicative of both dopaminergic and glutamatergic/N-methyl-D: -aspartic acid receptor dysfunctions. Further examination of their underlying neurobiological differences is therefore warranted in order to enhance the power of this specific inter-strain comparison as a model of schizophrenia.
Authors: Philipp A Csomor; Benjamin K Yee; Boris B Quednow; Renée R Stadler; Joram Feldon; Franz X Vollenweider Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2006-08-28 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: B Olivier; C Leahy; T Mullen; R Paylor; V E Groppi; Z Sarnyai; D Brunner Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Gerard B Fox; Timothy A Esbenshade; Jia Bao Pan; Richard J Radek; Kathleen M Krueger; Betty B Yao; Kaitlin E Browman; Michael J Buckley; Michael E Ballard; Victoria A Komater; Holly Miner; Min Zhang; Ramin Faghih; Lynne E Rueter; R Scott Bitner; Karla U Drescher; Jill Wetter; Kennan Marsh; Martine Lemaire; Roger D Porsolt; Youssef L Bennani; James P Sullivan; Marlon D Cowart; Michael W Decker; Arthur A Hancock Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-12-17 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Neal R Swerdlow; Martin Weber; Ying Qu; Gregory A Light; David L Braff Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-06-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: John P Redrobe; Morten Jørgensen; Claus T Christoffersen; Liliana P Montezinho; Jesper F Bastlund; Martin Carnerup; Christoffer Bundgaard; Linda Lerdrup; Niels Plath Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 4.530