Literature DB >> 19483144

Best practices in compound management for preserving compound integrity and accurately providing samples for assays.

Sandra L Matson1, Moneesh Chatterjee, David A Stock, John E Leet, Elizabeth A Dumas, Christian D Ferrante, William E Monahan, Lynda S Cook, John Watson, Normand J Cloutier, Meredith A Ferrante, John G Houston, Martyn N Banks.   

Abstract

Preserving the integrity of the compound collection and providing high-quality materials for drug discovery in an efficient and cost-effective manner are 2 major challenges faced by compound management (CM) at Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). The demands on CM include delivering hundreds of thousands of compounds a year to a variety of operations. These operations range from single-compound requests to hit identification support and just-in-time assay plate provision for lead optimization. Support needs for these processes consist of the ability to rapidly provide compounds as solids or solutions in a variety of formats, establishing proper long- and short-term storage conditions and creating appropriate methods for handling concentrated, potent compounds for delivery to sensitive biological assays. A series of experiments evaluating the effects of processing compounds with volatile solvents, storage conditions that can induce freeze/thaw cycles, and the delivery of compounds were performed. This article presents the results of these experiments and how they affect compound integrity and the accuracy of compound management processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19483144     DOI: 10.1177/1087057109336593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mitigating risk in academic preclinical drug discovery.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; James Inglese; Michael A Walters
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Enhancing reproducibility in cancer drug screening: how do we move forward?

Authors:  Christos Hatzis; Philippe L Bedard; Nicolai J Birkbak; Andrew H Beck; Hugo J W L Aerts; David F Stem; David F Stern; Leming Shi; Robert Clarke; John Quackenbush; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; Michael A Walters
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.808

4.  Dispensing processes impact apparent biological activity as determined by computational and statistical analyses.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Joe Olechno; Antony J Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modeling Small-Molecule Reactivity Identifies Promiscuous Bioactive Compounds.

Authors:  Matthew K Matlock; Tyler B Hughes; Jayme L Dahlin; S Joshua Swamidass
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.