Jeanelle Sheeder1, Karolyn Kabir, Brian Stafford. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. jeanelle.sheeder@ucdenver.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Screening for maternal depression is gaining acceptance as a standard component of well-child care. We tested the feasibility of this policy and determined the prevalence and incidence of maternal depression at well-child visits during the first 6 months of life. METHODS: Providers in an adolescent-oriented maternity program were cued electronically, when they opened the electronic medical records of 0- to 6-month-old infants to conduct well-child visits, to ask the mothers to complete the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Incident cases represented mothers who crossed the referral threshold (score of > or =10) after the first screening. RESULTS: Mothers usually brought their infants to the clinic, and none refused screening. Providers could act on 99% of the 418 screening cues; they administered the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale 98% of the time and always referred mothers with scores of > or =10. Overall, 20% of the mothers scored > or =10. Scores were unstable at < or =3 postpartum weeks (kappa = 0.2). Thereafter, the prevalence and incidence of scores of > or =10 decreased from 16.5% at 2 months to 10.3% and 5.7%, respectively, at 4 months. Prevalence increased to 18.5% at the 6-month visit, and incidence decreased to 1.9%. Repeat screening detected only 2 mothers (5.7%) with scores of > or =10. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic cueing improved compliance with the detection and referral phases of screening for maternal depression at well-child visits. Screening 2 months after delivery detects most mothers who become depressed during the first 6 postpartum months, and screening at the 6-month well-child visit is preferable to screening at the 4-month visit.
OBJECTIVE: Screening for maternal depression is gaining acceptance as a standard component of well-child care. We tested the feasibility of this policy and determined the prevalence and incidence of maternal depression at well-child visits during the first 6 months of life. METHODS: Providers in an adolescent-oriented maternity program were cued electronically, when they opened the electronic medical records of 0- to 6-month-old infants to conduct well-child visits, to ask the mothers to complete the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Incident cases represented mothers who crossed the referral threshold (score of > or =10) after the first screening. RESULTS: Mothers usually brought their infants to the clinic, and none refused screening. Providers could act on 99% of the 418 screening cues; they administered the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale 98% of the time and always referred mothers with scores of > or =10. Overall, 20% of the mothers scored > or =10. Scores were unstable at < or =3 postpartum weeks (kappa = 0.2). Thereafter, the prevalence and incidence of scores of > or =10 decreased from 16.5% at 2 months to 10.3% and 5.7%, respectively, at 4 months. Prevalence increased to 18.5% at the 6-month visit, and incidence decreased to 1.9%. Repeat screening detected only 2 mothers (5.7%) with scores of > or =10. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic cueing improved compliance with the detection and referral phases of screening for maternal depression at well-child visits. Screening 2 months after delivery detects most mothers who become depressed during the first 6 postpartum months, and screening at the 6-month well-child visit is preferable to screening at the 4-month visit.
Authors: Barbara P Yawn; Allen J Dietrich; Peter Wollan; Susan Bertram; Debbie Graham; Jessica Huff; Margary Kurland; Suzanne Madison; Wilson D Pace Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Mary McCord; Ruth E K Stein; Bonnie D Kerker; Dara Weiss; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Aaron E Carroll; Paul Biondich; Vibha Anand; Tamara M Dugan; Stephen M Downs Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Dwenda Gjerdingen; Scott Crow; Patricia McGovern; Michael Miner; Bruce Center Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sarah Lederberg Stone; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Howard J Cabral; Matthew P Fox; Lauren A Wise Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 2.681