PURPOSE: Postpartum depression is common but inadequately recognized and undertreated. Continuing depressive symptoms are associated with adverse outcomes for the woman, her infant, and family. We wanted to determine the effect of a practice-based training program for screening, diagnosis, and management of depression in postpartum mothers. METHODS: In this practice-based effectiveness study, 28 practices were randomized to usual care (n = 14) or intervention (n = 14), and 2,343 women were enrolled between 5 and 12 weeks' postpartum. The intervention sites received education and tools for postpartum depression screening, diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and follow-up within their practices. Usual-care practices received a 30-minute presentation about postpartum depression. Screening information for the usual care was obtained from baseline surveys sent directly to the central site but was not available for patient care. Outcomes were based on patient-reported outcomes (level of depressive symptoms) from surveys at 6 and 12 months, plus medical record review (diagnosis and therapy initiation). RESULTS: Among the 2,343 women enrolled, 1,897 (80.1%) provided outcome information, and were included in the analysis. Overall, 654 (34.5% of 1,897) women had elevated screening scores indicative of depression, with comparable rates in the intervention and usual-care groups. Among the 654 women withelevated postpartum depression screening scores, those in the intervention practices were more likely to receive a diagnosis (P = .0006) and therapy for postpartum depression (P = .002). They also had lower depressive symptom levels at 6 (P = .07) and 12 months' (P=.001) postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care-based screening, diagnosis, and management improved mother's depression outcomes at 12 months. This practical approach could be implemented widely with modest resources.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Postpartum depression is common but inadequately recognized and undertreated. Continuing depressive symptoms are associated with adverse outcomes for the woman, her infant, and family. We wanted to determine the effect of a practice-based training program for screening, diagnosis, and management of depression in postpartum mothers. METHODS: In this practice-based effectiveness study, 28 practices were randomized to usual care (n = 14) or intervention (n = 14), and 2,343 women were enrolled between 5 and 12 weeks' postpartum. The intervention sites received education and tools for postpartum depression screening, diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and follow-up within their practices. Usual-care practices received a 30-minute presentation about postpartum depression. Screening information for the usual care was obtained from baseline surveys sent directly to the central site but was not available for patient care. Outcomes were based on patient-reported outcomes (level of depressive symptoms) from surveys at 6 and 12 months, plus medical record review (diagnosis and therapy initiation). RESULTS: Among the 2,343 women enrolled, 1,897 (80.1%) provided outcome information, and were included in the analysis. Overall, 654 (34.5% of 1,897) women had elevated screening scores indicative of depression, with comparable rates in the intervention and usual-care groups. Among the 654 women with elevated postpartum depression screening scores, those in the intervention practices were more likely to receive a diagnosis (P = .0006) and therapy for postpartum depression (P = .002). They also had lower depressive symptom levels at 6 (P = .07) and 12 months' (P=.001) postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care-based screening, diagnosis, and management improved mother's depression outcomes at 12 months. This practical approach could be implemented widely with modest resources.
Authors: C MacArthur; H R Winter; D E Bick; H Knowles; R Lilford; C Henderson; R J Lancashire; D A Braunholtz; H Gee Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Allen J Dietrich; Thomas E Oxman; John W Williams; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; Sheila Barry; Patrick J Raue; Jean J Lefever; Moonseong Heo; Kathryn Rost; Kurt Kroenke; Martha Gerrity; Paul A Nutting Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-09-02
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Mary McCord; Ruth E K Stein; Bonnie D Kerker; Dara Weiss; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Nomi S Weiss-Laxer; Rheanna Platt; Lauren M Osborne; Mary Kimmel; Barry S Solomon; Tamar Mendelson; Lindsey Webb; Anne W Riley Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: André Bussières; Pierre Côté; Simon French; Marshall Godwin; Allan Gotlib; Ian D Graham; Diane Grondin; Cheryl Hawk; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Silvano Mior; Kent Stuber Journal: J Can Chiropr Assoc Date: 2014-03
Authors: Catherine Riffin; Jennifer L Wolff; Matthew Estill; Sheela Prabhu; Karl A Pillemer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rowena J Dolor; Kristine M Schmit; Deborah G Graham; Chester H Fox; Laura Mae Baldwin Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Bonnie Kerker; Ruth E K Stein; Dara Weiss; Emma D Whitmyre; Kimberly Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.681