Literature DB >> 19482051

Effects of prosodic familiarity on the automatic processing of words in the human brain.

Sari Ylinen1, Kuzma Strelnikov, Minna Huotilainen, Risto Näätänen.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effect of prosodic familiarity on automatic word processing in the brain by comparing the mismatch negativity (MMN) components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) elicited by words and pseudowords with familiar and unfamiliar stress patterns. The results show that the MMN was elicited by a change from unfamiliar to familiar words and a change from a familiar to an unfamiliar word-stress pattern.When familiar words were accompanied by an unfamiliar stress pattern, the MMN response was significantly delayed in comparison with the familiar words with a familiar stress pattern, suggesting that an unfamiliar prosodic pattern increased the computational needs in word recognition but did not prevent it. In addition to the effects of familiarity on the MMN, we found a positive brain response peaking between 100 and 200 ms that could be associated with the processing of familiar auditory objects. The present results expand the understanding of the early stages of speech processing in the human brain by demonstrating how automatic word processing is affected by prosodic cues that play an important role in the segmentation of continuous speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482051     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  6 in total

1.  Learning words without trying: Daily second language podcasts support word-form learning in adults.

Authors:  Elise Alexander; Stephen C Van Hedger; Laura J Batterink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-29

2.  Neural correlates of lexical stress: mismatch negativity reflects fundamental frequency and intensity.

Authors:  Hatice Zora; Iris-Corinna Schwarz; Mattias Heldner
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech.

Authors:  Alexandra K Emmendorfer; Joao M Correia; Bernadette M Jansma; Sonja A Kotz; Milene Bonte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of asymmetric processing of consonant duration in fake Mandarin geminates.

Authors:  Yaxuan Meng; Sandra Kotzor; Chenzi Xu; Hilary S Z Wynne; Aditi Lahiri
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Human Novelty Response to Emotional Animal Vocalizations: Effects of Phylogeny and Familiarity.

Authors:  Marina Scheumann; Anna S Hasting; Elke Zimmermann; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Mismatch Negativity Is Not Always Modulated by Lexicality.

Authors:  Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Suyeon Im
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.