Literature DB >> 19481845

Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping.

Lih-Huei Chen1, Ching-Lung Tai, Po-Liang Lai, De-Mei Lee, Tsung-Tin Tsai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Wen-Jer Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw fixation in a severely osteoporotic spine remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The previous literature does not adequately address the effects of radial holes for cannulated screws with cement injection and pilot hole tapping on the bone/screw interfacial strength.
METHODS: Specially designed cannulated pedicle screws, with or without radial holes, were installed in tapped and untapped pilot holes and then injected with cement. A uniform synthetic bone (test block) was used to provide a platform for each screw design. Specimens with inserted screws were then tested for axial pullout failure.
FINDINGS: (1) Cannulated screws with cement augmentation significantly increased the pullout strength in comparison to solid screws. Additionally, the amount of cement exuded from the cannulated screws increased with an increasing number of radial holes, leading to an increase in the average ultimate pullout strength for cannulated screws with a large number of radial holes. (2) Radiological examination indicated that the cement was exuded from the most proximal holes at the very beginning of its flow path, whereas no cement exudation was found at the remaining distal holes. (3) Cement exudation from the holes of cannulated screws into the open cell of the test block led to a composite (cement/bone) structure at the area of cement exudation. Observations of the failed specimens indicated that failure occurred at the composite/bone interface, while the composite was well bonded to the screws. This implies that the screw/composite interfacial strength was much higher than the composite/bone interfacial strength. (4) Tapping pilot holes decreased the pullout strength of the screws. Generally, larger standard deviations were found for the tapped cases, implying that untapped cases results are more repeatable than tapped cases results.
INTERPRETATION: Cannulated pedicle screws with radial holes combined with PMMA cement augmentation but without tapping may be a viable clinical option for achieving fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19481845     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  32 in total

1.  [Cement distribution in vertebroplasty pedicle screws with different designs].

Authors:  K Kafchitsas; F Geiger; M Rauschmann; S Schmidt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; R Rödl; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: a comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling.

Authors:  Lih-Huei Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; De-Mei Lee; Po-Liang Lai; Yen-Chen Lee; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Experimental validation of adaptive pedicle screws-a novel implant concept using shape memory alloys.

Authors:  Michael Werner; Niels Hammer; Christian Rotsch; Isabell Berthold; Mario Leimert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Anja Tschugg; Johannes Paesold; Pujan Kavakebi; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Hu; Hung Ta H Wu; Ming-Chau Chang; Wing-Kuang Yu; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The Influence of Thread Tap Mismatch on Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength.

Authors:  Rômulo Pedroza Pinheiro; Raffaello de Freitas Miranda; Antonio Carlos Shimano; Thibault Chandanson; Keri George; Helton L A Defino
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-01-21

9.  Different pedicle osteosynthesis for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Massimo Girardo; Alessandro Rava; Federico Fusini; Giosuè Gargiulo; Angela Coniglio; Pasquale Cinnella
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Early term effects of rhBMP-2 on pedicle screw fixation in a sheep model: histomorphometric and biomechanical analyses.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Toth; Mei Wang; Chetan K Patel; Akshi Arora
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.